Triode User
Member of the Trade: WAVE High Fidelity
I agree - to me R2R sound as bad as they measure, and when you measure them they are not fit for purpose. So I too don't understand where fans of this are coming from.
Subjective assessment does not need to be impossible - if you are very careful, and evaluate different parameters separately, it is entirely possible to objectively quantify subjective listening tests - but it is very hard to do accurately.
I compared a friend's £5k R2R dac and my Qutest knocked it into a cocked hat. There was no real competition. There is a craze at the moment for a particular expensive R2R dac with add on digital boxes and I think they are just doing the classic mistake of confusing a different sound with better. Five minutes is the maximum time I have endured a R2R dac before wanting to turn it off.