Here comes a very long post, but I sure would appreciate any thoughts.
My scattered history of audio ending with an existential question.
At age 67, I’ve seen and heard a lot.
Pre-transistors, but studios produce records kids could buy as 45’s.
Pop buying a console stereo for the living room. Kids had a phonograph in their bedroom.
Audiophiles stepping up to components.
Then transistors took over in early 70’s, which enabled good quality recordings at a lower cost. (As an aside, the reason tubes kept progressing in the USSR was that they kept preparing for nuclear war and tubes don’t shut down from EMP from nuclear bomb – USSR kept using tubes in military communications systems until the Berlin Wall fell – so you get tube amps out of Poland, etc.)
On to the business side.
Dick Clark with American Bandstand realized that the kids don’t want to hear the song..they want to hear the record! So bands lip sync and fake playing on TV. (I’ll get back to this.)
Music from the 70’s and on is recorded very well. Classical and Jazz to play on FM and component stereos.
Did you know that the Beatles flew to Chicago and Detroit to record some of their music because they were so impressed with the engineering quality. And played live in the studio. (Will get back to this.)
Tapes..Cassettes, cartridges.. phoeey.
The CD’s. Herbert Van Karajan set the CD size because he insisted that Beethoven’s 9th fit on a CD. Decided the tradeoff between quality and size of the physical medium.
Did you know that on record albums the songs with the fastest beats and most excitement were the first or second tracks? Move information per revolution on the outside. Slow songs in the inside.
Now we stream.
But the kids listen on earbuds while they workout. They take a phone to a party with a playlist on it, and plug it in.
The history leads us to where we are today. Producers driven to make money. Studios wanting work. The BUSINESS of music.
I just read the most interesting article. Why does live music sound so much better? (provided it’s properly engineered.) Because the musicians are free to perform! In the studio, they are doing “takes” and don’t want to screw up lots of work by making a mistake. But “live” they can cut loose and just play!
All of this is a very long way to ask for thoughts re this. We have these great setups anchored with Susvara. But what are we listening to? Are recording engineered for us, or for Mom jogging with a stroller with Apple buds?
What percentage of music recorded today is produced, engineered, performed by the artists for our audiophile community?
Me? I love live music and am happy with Amazon HD. But I feel like most music just doesn’t do all this expense justice. But when it all is there. BAM.
Thoughts re my ramble?
One frustration I do have is that there is so much great music to discover on YouTube.. live performances recorded, but the SQ ain’t audiophile.