ASR goal on headphones is to know if a headphones fit the vast majority of people. But we are a niche of very hardcore enjoyers that doesn't want a mainstream sound signature. It really doesn't surprise me that ASR doesn't recommend what most audiophile like. So it doesn't change my mind if it measures bad or not. Can't wait his review on my other best headphones, the D8000pro that will hit clipping at 114dB for sure.
That is not the point. Susvara isn’t the best in terms of measurements and does not adhere to the Harman target well. This is has been public information for as long as Susvara exists. But that’s fine, another source of measurements is always good in that we can see over the time if the Susvara’s sound changed, or if there is some big unit variation going on.
Even though Amir has shown incompetence when measuring headphones, sometimes using questionable methodology, most notably with Hifiman Ananda and Sennheiser HD598, that is not the biggest issue here.
The biggest problem in his post is his
subjective review section and wording that are driven purely to get more clicks to the website.
It is evident by the wording used in the article. Frequency Response “errors”? Depending on the target curve (say OE 2017) used, it might not even exist when Susvara was in development, how would Hifiman tune the headphones to a target that didn’t even exist at the time? Secondly, there was no evidence that the Susvara was even tuned to the Harman Target to begin with. Not to mentioned there are multiple Harman Target curves?
Saying it’s an error because it doesn’t adhere to their desired target is the same as saying your expensive apple juice is garbage because it does not taste like lemon tea. It makes no sense. Harman target was never intended as the be all and end all of all sound signatures. The people who developed the Harman target would have been face planting themselves knowing the years of research has been misused and misrepresented like this.
Another evidence is the numerous of times he mentioned the distortion at 114dB. For speakers, I can sort of understand. If your room is massive and you want to EQ some extra bass, you might want to know that piece of information. But headphones are, you know, meant to be used on your head, not as a speaker. Most people wouldn’t listen to Susvara from across the room. So while it’s good knowledge to know it distorts at 114dB, it is not applicable to most people. In fact, if you do want do play it that loud on your head, it is highly ill advised do so, OSHA rated at these levels you can get premature hearing loss within minutes of listening. It is baffling that a supposedly science driven website can fail to acknowledge this. And since it’s very rare for anyone to listen at such loud volume, the fact that it has high distortion at these level should just be a piece of “good to know” information, instead of a point of concern.
With his “subjective” conclusion, chances are either he has golden ears that is so good he does not suffer from any hearing loss and/or he is able to hear distortions that is not normally audible by humans, and/or he is just writing his script based on the measurements he already made.
At the end of the day, our preference is purely subjective. While some people prefers their apple juice to taste like lemon tea, I (and most people) prefer apple juice to taste like apple juice, like the manufacturer intended.