StanD
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2013
- Posts
- 9,002
- Likes
- 1,134
I guess I'm being combative with you, but I think it all has to do with how our brain perceives the entirety of what we hear. We may not hear a single tone at a specific frequency, but IMO those frequencies have to do with how we interpret things like stage, imaging, dynamics, timing, detail, tonal balance etc...
And no I don't have any studies to back this up (maybe there are some?) but I also don't think experiments on how one "hears" a certain sound are indicative of any real world experience. They are however indicative of that particular test environment, which in turn is a bias onto itself.
A true "double blind" study to me would be sitting at home on my recliner without any knowledge that I'm being guinea pigged. And there are those times where I say, "hey wait a minute, is this the CD verison?" lo and behold...
Edit: I'm being a little too harsh in saying "any" real world experience. Sure we can draw correlations etc. But it ain't the boiling point of water (then again, where am I going to find a perfectly straight line in the natural world?). Theory needs application.
Edit 2: Maybe not CD, but there is plenty of data above the human auditory range on highly sampled material....
I don't know what you are really trying to establish but human beings have constraints and ultrasonics is not in our hearing, hence the term ultrasonic. There's plenty of proper studies you can find that establish what we can and cannot hear. There's also a lot of conjecture that distracts and confuses many people. There really is no magic here. this is simple stuff. Certain anilmals can hear ultrasonics, like bats, however, we cannot.