[ardilla]

 

[ardilla]

 

[AngelWho]

Quote:

  
 

 

What! - I CHALLENGE!!!!!​

 ​

​

 ​

​

 ​

​

 

[Yuceka]

Let's read it again 
 

 

[ardilla]

I STAND CORRECTED!!!
 
(AngelWho.. Be ware of the spoiler-function for such content....
 

 
Here are some suitable clothing for the poor unbeclothed women
 

  

    

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

[ardilla]

Here is something clothed

 
 

click this gif if it doesnt move  
 
 
 
 

 

[ardilla]

manga or whatever they call it  http://oreno.imouto.org/post/index?tags=headphones

 

[Ynoskire]

Sorry for the Ibuds.

 

[ardilla]

More ibuds - this is also with sufficient clothing 
   

 

[ardilla]

with clothes AND umbrella
!

 

 

[AngelWho]

She's got it COVERED!​

​

 ​

​

 ​

 ​

So do they!!!​

 ​

​

 ​

​

 ​

​

 ​

​

 ​

​

 

[Yuceka]

Much better  

 

[Tablo]

Cheap AKG headphones

 

[GreatDane]

 

[Lunatique]

Quote:

Let's read it again 
 

Just wondering, where is the line drawn? A nude upper torso of a male is nude, but no one will bat an eyelash about it. The bare back of a woman's upper torso is also nude, but no one will care either. And if a person is shown nude but no nipples or genitals or pubic hair is shown, then is it actually offensive? There are far trashier images posted with hyper-sexualized images that may not be nude, but are subjectively far more offensive than a mere nude figure that has no erotic overtones whatsoever. (Mind you, I'm not offended by any of this stuff at all--just asking.)