Quote:
Originally Posted by erikzen
This is the first time I've read that there is a difference in sound quality between V6 and 7506. My understanding was that the difference was in the target market and related marketing, like the Shure E2 and E2C. Thanks for the info. What is your reference for this information?
|
At the Seattle meet back in August, Phil (PPL) had a pair of 7506's. We were talking about them, and he claimed they were different from the V6. I had my V6's with me, so I A-B'd them on xanadu777's PPA (don't remember source). I listened to some stuff from Muse's Absolution CD and one of my Juno Reactor cds. The upper midrange was clearer on the 7506 and the treble extended very noticably higher. The treble was not exciting, but sounded rather natural to me. It made the V6 sound muffled.
I don't know how old his 7506's were or how many hours were on them. My V6's are about 4 years old and were my primary listening phone for two of those years. There's a chance I could have damaged them during that time since I used them for dj'ing as well, but the sides are still perfectly uniform, so I don't think there is any damage to my V6's.
You may want to PM PPL and see if he owns the V6 as well. I cannot remember if he does or not.
Anyway, I wouldn't make a purchase until you get a chance to listen to a 7506 if you're looking for a studio phone. Guitar Center and many chains carry them in-store.
(edit)
Oh yeah, I forgot to mention. One downside to the V6/7506 is that they are closed, and don't have the best imaging. I would place the Senn 580, 600, and of course AKG's over them for imaging. I generally prefer my current Grado's for listening over the V6 because I like the better imaging and I'm a treble-head when it comes to rock. I want those cymbals to be painful when I crank it.