West726
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2009
- Posts
- 1,705
- Likes
- 17
Careful. . .
Originally Posted by West726 /img/forum/go_quote.gif Careful. . . |
Originally Posted by Pale Rider /img/forum/go_quote.gif Interesting. Just so I understand you correctly, when you say "top" and "bottom," are you referring to orientations with respect to the DAP or something else? |
Originally Posted by Pale Rider /img/forum/go_quote.gif Um, what did I say or what did I miss? |
Originally Posted by Kpalsm /img/forum/go_quote.gif Yeah. Say I velcro'd it to the back of my iPod. I would prefer to have as tiny an LOD as possible, going straight from the LO port right into the input, like half an inch away. Then the output and volume would be on top, so I could stick the whole thing in my pocket and use it just as easily as I would use my iPod (or even more easily!). Location of possible bass boost isn't as important as it'll be left on (if using my E4c, as long as it's a moderate bass boost, such as the T4's). That'd be the perfect amp for me. Being able to operate from inside my pocket is very important to me. I'd probably have to build such an amp myself though |
Originally Posted by West726 /img/forum/go_quote.gif Surely nothing at all. Seriously, is there not even an estimated date for these? It was once "late summer." I don't mean to rush; I'd just like to have some order in my life. |
Originally Posted by oxophone /img/forum/go_quote.gif $300 is a sweet price point. and hope it produces better SQ - warmer as HPA mentioned - than the original pico headamp. Justin, how's the sound signature (vis-a-vis the original pico) of the latest prototype/ built you have? |
Stay updated on HeadAmp at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
|
Originally Posted by justin w. /img/forum/go_quote.gif despite the much higher cost of parts of the Pico Slim, and time spent designing it. |