DBB1
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2010
- Posts
- 192
- Likes
- 78
Thanks to all those who responded and helped to convince me. I put in an order today. Will report back on my impressions on how it compares to the x12 in a month or so.
I am not really in a position to comment since I have only ever used Windows. However, given the speed of todays processors and memory, advances made in the various OS, the quality of the USB interface, and the maturity of the ASIO and WASAPI drivers then I don't think the underlying OS will have much of an influence on the sound. My lounge system has a dedicated Windows 10 music player and rarely skips a beat. I find upsampling Foobar to DSD128 provides the most satisfying sound experience.
I also use Windows 10 on my Office system (which is also the Music server) with optional ASUS DS7.1 sound card and Schiit Loki DAC. I have loaded the ASIO4ALL driver to support Kernel Streaming to the sound card and the Schiit ASIO DSD64 driver for the Loki. I much prefer the Loki output compared to the sound card. When I first tested the X20u I did not notice much improvement over the Loki which I put down to the quality of the preamp and speakers. I don't use headphones. Also, I do a lot more processing on my office system (i5 2500k clocked to 4.2GHz and running web browsing, word processing, spreadsheets, ripping) and rarely does it interfere with the music normally playing in the background.
My lounge system with the dedicated notebook music processor (JRiver benchmark score of 2200), X20u DAC, AVM PA5.2 pre amp, AVM MA3.2 power amp and magneplanar 1.7 speakers, is much more exciting than my office system, provides a stable well defined image, and justifies the investment in the X20u. I have made minimal changes to Windows and have not gone down the path of deleting redundant services. The CPU load (i7 620m) rarely exceeds 10%. I did not notice any changes moving from Windows 8.1 to Windows 10. And I prefer Foobar to JRiver - I feel I have more control using Foobar and I like the tablet client interface. Also I don't have to pay an annual JRiver licensing fee.
Thanks to all those who responded and helped to convince me. I put in an order today. Will report back on my impressions on how it compares to the x12 in a month or so.
Looking forward to your impression on this DAC!
My X20U has just arrived. I found it so much better than my previous XMOS-1794 DAC, which won't take DSD streams.
The X20U has more details and tighter bass, which is what I'm looking for. I will report again after it is burned in, in a few weeks!
Good afternoon , my friends recently bought the device from Gustard x20, I am very happy , sound good . But I have two questions that I care about , I have not worked on and off button on the remote control , tell you , too, right? And another question screen after a few minutes becomes less bright , not whether it should be switched off completely ?
.....
Anyay, I've taken the plunge and ordered an X20u from Kidult via Amazon.co.uk.
Price was £579.00 and includes UK tax and free delivery. Which seems a very
reasonable amount for what's being offered. Plus, I had the security of doing
this through Amazon and all that entails. If I'd had to negotiate unknown ( to me )
foreign websites and pay high potential import/customs/admin fees etc ( as I have
done in the past ), I don't think I'd have ended up going for it.
.....
Here's a little more on the subject that I posted in the H10 thread when talking about these two filters on the Gustard X12 ----
I think you are referring to the two switchable filters that you can access from the front panel buttons. The two filters are designated "Sharp" and "Slow." These are built into the ES9018 chip and everyone seems to think that the ESS boys did a good job with them.
Stereophile tested these and produced these graphs. The one on the left is the "Slow" filter and you can see that high frequency response is slightly rolled off as compared to the "Sharp" filter on the right. The Sharp, or "brick wall" filter does have more "pre-ringing" than does the Slow and some people think this pre-ringing sounds somewhat unnatural. The slow filter has much less pre-ringing at the price of letting a more aliased signal image through and theoretically increasing harmonic distortion. In my experience, the difference between these filters on the X12 is pretty subtle and very music dependent to really identify the differences. Generally speaking, I find the Sharp filter to set the stage a little further back, provides a slightly more dynamic and tighter bass and a more airy, extended treble. The Slow filter warms things up a bit, giving what some would call a "darker" sound. It loses some of the top end air and detail in favor of a slightly more relaxed, forgiving sound.
By the way, for those of you asking about the smoothness of the X12 and how well it eschews the apparently ubiquitous Sabre glare, I can tell you that I do most of my listening with the Sharp filter with no problems whatsoever with glare or harshness. I'm a soundstage/imaging freak, so I want the lowest possible noise floor to let the ambient cues rise above the surface (think draining lake analogy again) and the best possible high frequency extension and resolution. I'm getting this with the X12 on Sharp and I'm very satisfied. So much so, that I already sent the Aune S16 packing. Yep, it's on its way to France to another head-fier. I also have the Rega Apollo R with the Wolfson 8742. So many have commented about Wolfson dacs sounding more relaxed and musical than sabre dacs, that I of course had to do a lot of A-B listening between the two. I concluded that the X12 outperforms the Apollo R's dac in almost every parameter. In fact, when I run the X12 with the Slow filter, they are surprisingly close in overall sound signature with the X12 having a little more dynamic punch and still revealing a little more low level information.
FlySweep, I couldn't be happier with the HE-560's (thanks for the encouragement) and I would thoroughly enjoy your take on the X12. If you are interested in an affordable Sabre dac that sounds very sweet, like a Wolfson with a little more air and detail, I think this is the one.
Hello Stuart,
So does it mean that the interface shows 4 different settings when the X20 is playing a DSD signal instead of PCM?