Griffith
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2005
- Posts
- 442
- Likes
- 293
Not sure, but at least it creates a larger playground, but obviously, it's up to developers/manufactures to take full advantage of all potential features and benefits. All else being equal, I would take BT 5.0 over 4.2, but the mere mention of BT 5.0 when selling a product, leans more hypebeast over substance. Design, implementation, and quality wholesale execution is far more important than stats.
For example, my B&O E8 (BT 4.2) get better range with my iPhone Xs Max than some of my BT 5.0 Chi-Fi units. Again, apples to apples with the only difference being BT version, I'll take BT 5.0 all day, every day.
If I'm looking at more expensive gear, I would look for BT 5.0 to offset obsolescence.
Like I mentioned before in another response, I believe that Bluetooth range has more to do with the design of the device than the version of Bluetooth used. Of course, if all things are equal, a newer version of Bluetooth will have better range, but that's never the case so, in my opinion, it's a mute argument. There's a response just after my original one of someone with a pair of Bluetooth 5 wireless IEMs reporting connectivity issues.
Lastly, while I understand that someone would prefer Bluetooth 5 because of its new features, it should not be because of obsolescence. There's no such thing as Bluetooth obsolescence. Bluetooth is backwards compatible.