@Donald D ;Brilliant, and thankyou for linking me to this...
with regards to these statements;
Nice, I thought. But when the singing set it, the voice of Prince sounded a bit more anaemic, as if his presence had moved to the back and the voice didn't touch one anymore. Bummer, I thought. I moved on to the Carlos Santana piece. Same thing, Everlast's voice makes that song and it was less present with the Cardas cable. Needless to say, the same disappoint with the Simply Red song.
For me THAT is the big benefit that was gained when moving to a high quality LadderDAC (/'R2R')...
When I used a Topping D90 it sounded 'technically accurate' to the audio that was recorded ,but the biggest deficit vs the cheapest AudioGd DAC from over a decade ago (dual Wolfson 8741 DAC chips) (or an iFi Diablo(dual BurrBrown 1793s) et al), was completely to do with stage setup (no depth) and vocals..
Whilst the Delta/Sigma designs by other manufacturers (and circuit topologies) seems to flog the D90 for musicality, it was the R2R designs ('Ladder DACs') that returned HONESTY to vocal playback. It actually starts to swing the 'other way' with supreme clarity to vocals (and proper wavering of intimate throat techniques really coming to the forefront...)
Now that you have a reference system that would reveal those differences, I suppose we find ourselves in the place that other equipment rotations can lead too.. kit swapping for perfect matching... (a system being the sum of its parts).
I personally have had multiple times where something as innocuous as a digital cable changeover brought such better delivery of zeros and ones (remember it is analogue wavelength by which they transmit, and 'eyelets' need to match up, and 'error correction'/'guesswork' techniques generally clean up the 'misreads', that when changing in a part that improves the feed (noticably) the resultant bass waves (hard to do as they need many many many more reads for a full wavelength rise and fall... ) actually requires me to down tune a subwoofers volume. (this is super obvious to anyone that tunes rooms or engineers as we become hyper sensitive to a half dB of volume boost or cut... )..
Many people swear all DACs sound the same..
of course many of us might argue about output stages and 'more to a DAC (component) than just the DAC CHIP itself', but with regards to having the vocal range, something us humans are naturally hyper sensitive towards... the biggest benefits of EVERY R2R/ladder DAC in system setups, for me at least,.. has always been in the natural vocal rendition.
I feel that with the Cardas cable in place on the clearly revealing headphone rig, might net further benefits, by having a feed that actually gives out what we are seeking.. (and that previously the 'mish mash' sent down a cable made without consideration to audio (based on the notion that three or four spec sheet measurements tells us EVERYTHING about audio) is of course a likely possibility.
I whole heartedly agree that many many companies make cables due to the associated 'blind leading the blind' and Gear Acquisitions Syndrome crowds (who justify their purchases with glowing reviews of kit that may offer little for the price outlayed...).. but then some parts make a difference.
To be fair to the much cheaper Focals I toyed with (a set of 'Clear's), they sounded to me like they desperately needed TWO things..
a)breakin
b)a half decent cable upgrade
I put 800 hours on them and that made them massively better, sure...
but vs most kit of that tier (or higher), they come across to me as confused and 'a hard listen' to sit through...
Based on my previous experience with some Nordost/Cardas and an ALO cable; they would likely improve substantially, but I cannot be bothered to waste my time further on 'trying to make those headphones something I am unsure they are even capable of being'...
Certainly a chance for a 'night/day' difference in audio via a simple upgrade.. but I am thinking that the manufacturer themselves are not believers in cable quality at all.. (beyond making them 'tough'/'durable'
I bought the Clear for the 2x long cables that they came with.. as they added perceived value to that sale in my eyes... but placing the Focal included cables on 'other' headwear (eg some Sony MDR Z7 over ears), those cables killed the sound vs the cables that Sony included... (Sony engineers trialed around 50 solder recipes when lead based solder left the market as the replacement solder 'didn't sound right'), I am guessing Sony knows that cables contribute to sound quality and the included cables are a step up...
The Sony cable on the Focal Clear ? =better imaging and stage setup TRUE..
We can argue ad nauseum about 'science and theory' (we seem to be in the 'dark ages')..
but real world application reveals there certainly IS something more to all this...
sadly humans are not really consistent in our findings, hence any notion of 'science' (requires 100% repeatability) goes right out the door..
Once we get to summit-fi setups (whole chain), sidegrading parts (or attempting to 'upgrade' to higher tiers) gets pretty expensive.. (scaling returns)
Cables start to be a 'cheap upgrades' and great system tuners, if we can sort the wheat from the chaff with regards to the cable companies that actually know what they are doing.
I once bought an expensive interconnect set that claimed to add 'air' to the setup..
Some Bowers and Wilkins DM1 (domestic monitors from the sixties that even have supertweeters) via a lowly NAD 3020 amp (early eighties success in the budget arena) clearly showed up those interconnects as being ARRRGH for actual hifi setups..
however if used into a surround amp that was posing it could do 'stereo music', probably added an almost undetectable sense of air.. (different strokes for different,.erm, 'setups')
Vocals and valve amps and vocals and ladder DACs are a 'given' to me.
Class D amps (majority) and/or 'spec sheet warfare DACs are absolute butchers when it comes to honest HUMAN vocals. Focals sans a cable mod probably would mask the differences. (this stuff is super subtle, until it isn't... )
A cable upgrade can EASILY reveal more details and nuances (that master musicians spend a lifetime to make apart of their accomplished repertoire).. whilst I fully agree "your mileage MAY vary'; the fact remains many pundits find much success and hence joy, in the resultant sound.
Focal (Clear) needs something done to it, and I have trialled via some 'nice kit' and having rotated a Grace m903/Burson Conductor V2 and an AudioGdR28 (and others like a an iFi Diablo/Sony PHA3 etc); they change with equipment matching, but are far inferior to most other headwear in similar pricepoint or 'tier'.
I believe they are held back by their included cables.
Cables don't matter; just ask any AI Bot and anyone who believes that spec sheets matter more than your personal listening experience.
I am not here to argue and 'apologies' to anyone who thinks a long winded post is an agenda.
Lets just let the grain of sand exist for those who want some 'food for thunk'.
(I do not need an education with regards to cables altering sound.. my background is scientific in process and includes many years of tertiary psychology education- I concur that simply being relaxed when listening is worth more to the resultant HEARD sound that the kit that delivers the music) (
and... cables DO matter, erm, to 'me' at least.. hope this viewpoint helps someone trying to absolutely LOVE their Focal hi-end headwear).