I was reading Tyll's re-assessment or the Utopia and I'm a little surprised he finds the "razor sharp peak at 6kHz" so objectionable. It's curious because to me the Utopia has great tonal balance and is very smooth sounding and listenable for hours on end. Maybe my hearing has a dip at 6KHz?
What's also curious is that the Clear has a very similar peak at 6KHz. The main difference in the responses of the two headphones seems to be the small peak on the Utopia at 4K before it dips towards 5K - the Clear starts dipping slightly before 4kHz with a wider trough between 4-5.5KHz (before the 6KHz peak).
I had the same thoughts. Mine too sound super smooth, and for me, still the best headphone under $5,000. it doesn't make sense on how he once said it was the best headphone to now not even worthy of being on the Hall of Fame..
I agree with you Tobes and Energy!
Among others, I listen to high-pitched metal, sometimes for hours, and if the Utopia had such a peak, I would hear it and it would be fatiguing, which is the case with the HD 800 and K812 which unfortunately do have such a fatiguing peak.
(I could understand that the wealth of information provided by the Utopia (tonal details, speed, imaging separation and positioning of sound sources) could be seen as overwhelming and too much for some people, in this sense fatiguing, but then this is not a default, and you can just turn the volume down).
BTW, I listened for 3h1/2 last Friday to a bunch of TOTL headphones with my own amp at a store and with some (mostly metal) tracks I use for comparisons,
their Utopia just sounded like mine,
and it was for me clearly the best, e.g. the LCD-4 and the expensive Susvara (although much better than the HE1000 V2) in this set up could not match for the level of details, speed, drum attacks and 3D imaging separation and precision of the Utopia,
you can see my comparative impressions here:
https://www.head-fi.org/threads/totl-headphones-comparison.856079/page-4#post-13956473
Re. Innerfideltiy's removal of the Utopia from their WoF, I fear this may have to do with Bob Katz who is also part of Innerfidelity, loves headphones like the Oppo PM-3 (very dark and dull) or the LCD-4 (dark), and opposed strongly that the Utopia made it so well to the WoF and not the LCD-4
(even using different amps = scientifically invalid comparisons, i.e. not comparing thje headphones themselves but amp-headphones combinations, and not with measurements but with the output of speakers which he had been tuned to his liking, not with a feedback loop giving them a flat FR...).
BTW I had already compared my DAC-amp (RME ADI-2 PRO) in NOS mode to my SP1000Cu, and at the store compared it with the Hugo 2, all with my Utopia,
they are all globally the same level of SQ, so I find this interesting because if you can get more from the Utopia with the Dave than with the Hugo 2, then it would be also the same when going from my RME DAC-amp to the Dave.
Morever I find the following comparisons of SQ are very interesting:
ray-dude said:
I would say if Mojo is an overall 4 and Hugo2 is an overall 6 and DAVE is an overall 10 (using the scale from my Mojo vs Hugo2 vs DAVE review), then BluDAVE is 40, and BluHugo2 is maybe ~25.
https://www.head-fi.org/showcase/chord-blu-mk-ii-digital-cd-transport.22848/reviews#review-19675
In this case for me who don't want devices that cannot be normally stacked like the Dave or the Blu2 (and don't need an expensive CD-player, I only use them for ripping new CDs),
I dream Chord would produce a DAC-amp with filter of the Blu2 in the format of a normally stackable desktop device like the Chord TT (and ideally without the volume buttons and lights, just a normal button)