davidmolliere
Headphoneus Supremus
I like your notes and agree in large part. The Vegas are way more colored in comparison and I expect that many people would prefer the Flares over them. I fully admit to having an unhealthy obsession with the Vega's sound and have since the first time I ever heard them. It's like they were made specifically for my ears and nothing else can come close... So I'm definitely biased. That said, I totally agree that the flares are very impressive, particularly when using the BT module.
I totally understand, the Vega are unique in their tuning and you either love or hate it, if you hate it though you MUST make sure that you've based your listening on a burned in unit (yes that liquid diamond driver needs it) and a proper source (powerful DAP, Amp) otherwise you say they're crap you haven't really heard them Although I love it I find it fatiguing at times.
I'll be burning in the Flares PRO, I expect them to change over time into something even smoother and refined, we'll see.
One thing I failed to mention too, the PRO are faster than the R2Pro and by a significant margin IMHO.
Anynone has gotten their hands on the PRO spec (impedance, sensitivity...I expect similar to the R2Pro) or DAC module ?
Edit : I did some quick tip rolling with RHA Dual Density, MandarinES hybrid, Ortofon Foams and so far convinced that those "audiophiles" Flare tips have been very specifically design to make the best out of the IEM. It particularly affects soundstage and imaging but also the balance of the sound. In particular every other tips I have tested means more bass quantity (and loss of bass detail) and less "air".
Last edited: