jasonl
Member of the Trade: Heap Venture
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2008
- Posts
- 470
- Likes
- 32
Quote:
Quote:Do we know which Sabre chip is inside the uDac-2?
Ive read that it uses the ESS Sabre 9022.
uDAC2 doesn't use ESS Sabre chip
Quote:Do we know which Sabre chip is inside the uDac-2?
Ive read that it uses the ESS Sabre 9022.
uDAC2 doesn't use ESS Sabre chip
RE: the 'missing 96/24 bit output on the uDAC-2:
I've had the same problem intermittently for several weeks on several Mac's and reported this apparent problem with the USB driver to the NuForce help desk over a week ago. In the meantime, [waiting for the Help Desk to return from CES] I've exhaustively tried different ways to fix the problem including reinstalling a clean copy of both MacOSX 10.5.8 and 10.6.6 on three separate Mac's to eliminate any possibility of a corrupt USB driver but to no avail - the uDac2 refused to play 96/24 bit data.
As I was moving the uDac2 between Mac's today, I accidentally discovered the source of the problem: In the AudioMIDI setup utility if BOTH the Input and Output settings are 96/24 bits, then the uDAC2 is silent - however if you set the INPUT to 96/16 bits, and leave the OUTPUT set at 96/24 bits you hear MUSIC!!!
It looks to me that the USB receiver chip in the uDAC2 is not handshaking properly with the MacOSX USB driver at the 96/24bit sample rate. This is obviously something that the NuForce folks need to investigate with Apple
scs999
Quote:RE: the 'missing 96/24 bit output on the uDAC-2:
I've had the same problem intermittently for several weeks on several Mac's and reported this apparent problem with the USB driver to the NuForce help desk over a week ago. In the meantime, [waiting for the Help Desk to return from CES] I've exhaustively tried different ways to fix the problem including reinstalling a clean copy of both MacOSX 10.5.8 and 10.6.6 on three separate Mac's to eliminate any possibility of a corrupt USB driver but to no avail - the uDac2 refused to play 96/24 bit data.
As I was moving the uDac2 between Mac's today, I accidentally discovered the source of the problem: In the AudioMIDI setup utility if BOTH the Input and Output settings are 96/24 bits, then the uDAC2 is silent - however if you set the INPUT to 96/16 bits, and leave the OUTPUT set at 96/24 bits you hear MUSIC!!!
It looks to me that the USB receiver chip in the uDAC2 is not handshaking properly with the MacOSX USB driver at the 96/24bit sample rate. This is obviously something that the NuForce folks need to investigate with Apple
scs999
999,
I had the same problem. I tried the 96/16 but that didn't work for me. I never got to test the second unit NuForce sent to me because it as defective right out of the box. The on/off light indicator never went off, it was always on and there was severe distortion in the left channel from both the RCA out and the headphone out. I was pretty annoyed by the second unit arriving as it did and a bit more annoyed by Jason's attitude here in this thread. The whole attitude of hey it's not a $1000 piece of equipment so you have to expect noise or whatever really doesn't sit well with me. I decided I'm going to update my rig now with about 2K worth of new equipment. None of it is going to NuForce.
Quote:Quote:Do we know which Sabre chip is inside the uDac-2?
Ive read that it uses the ESS Sabre 9022.
uDAC2 doesn't use ESS Sabre chip
Quote:
Quote:Quote:Do we know which Sabre chip is inside the uDac-2?
Ive read that it uses the ESS Sabre 9022.
uDAC2 doesn't use ESS Sabre chip
They must have changed DAC chips in the uDAC2 --> See post #126:
http://www.head-fi.org/forum/thread/456945/first-impressions-nuforce-udac-usb-dac-amp-with-line-out-and-s-pdif-out/120#post_6239103
Apparently NuForce WAS using an ESS9022 Sabre DAC in the previous model uDAC.
The new one sounds great - I wonder which chip they're using now?
scs999
Quote:Quote:
Quote:Quote:Do we know which Sabre chip is inside the uDac-2?
Ive read that it uses the ESS Sabre 9022.
uDAC2 doesn't use ESS Sabre chip
They must have changed DAC chips in the uDAC2 --> See post #126:
http://www.head-fi.org/forum/thread/456945/first-impressions-nuforce-udac-usb-dac-amp-with-line-out-and-s-pdif-out/120#post_6239103
Apparently NuForce WAS using an ESS9022 Sabre DAC in the previous model uDAC.
The new one sounds great - I wonder which chip they're using now?
scs999
Sorry,uDAC-2 still uses ESS 9022, it was the front-end chip that got changed and I got it mixed up.
Quote:Quote:RE: the 'missing 96/24 bit output on the uDAC-2:
I've had the same problem intermittently for several weeks on several Mac's and reported this apparent problem with the USB driver to the NuForce help desk over a week ago. In the meantime, [waiting for the Help Desk to return from CES] I've exhaustively tried different ways to fix the problem including reinstalling a clean copy of both MacOSX 10.5.8 and 10.6.6 on three separate Mac's to eliminate any possibility of a corrupt USB driver but to no avail - the uDac2 refused to play 96/24 bit data.
As I was moving the uDac2 between Mac's today, I accidentally discovered the source of the problem: In the AudioMIDI setup utility if BOTH the Input and Output settings are 96/24 bits, then the uDAC2 is silent - however if you set the INPUT to 96/16 bits, and leave the OUTPUT set at 96/24 bits you hear MUSIC!!!
It looks to me that the USB receiver chip in the uDAC2 is not handshaking properly with the MacOSX USB driver at the 96/24bit sample rate. This is obviously something that the NuForce folks need to investigate with Apple
scs999
999,
I had the same problem. I tried the 96/16 but that didn't work for me. I never got to test the second unit NuForce sent to me because it as defective right out of the box. The on/off light indicator never went off, it was always on and there was severe distortion in the left channel from both the RCA out and the headphone out. I was pretty annoyed by the second unit arriving as it did and a bit more annoyed by Jason's attitude here in this thread. The whole attitude of hey it's not a $1000 piece of equipment so you have to expect noise or whatever really doesn't sit well with me. I decided I'm going to update my rig now with about 2K worth of new equipment. None of it is going to NuForce.
When recording on a Mac, the AudioMIDI setup utility is used to set the sample rate & bit depth and for an audio interface which both records [A to D] and plays back [D to A] like the Apogee Duet or Motu 828, etc. In this case, you normally have BOTH the input and output set to the same settings and the AudioMIDI utility does this automatically this when you set either the input or output.
However the uDac2 is only an OUTPUT device [D to A] and when you use the AudioMIDI utility to set the output rate to 96/24 bits, the INPUT in the software [even though there isn't any on a DAC] defaults to the same 96/24 bits. For some reason, this causes the uDAC2 to cease passing the analog music signal UNLESS you reset the INPUT side to 96/16 bit. This makes no sense to me but there appears to be a problem with the USB interface handshake at 96/24 that this 'workaround' fixes.
Just to be clear, what works every time [for me] is to set the output to 96/24bits first and then the input to 96/16.
@ JasolL:
"Our engineering staff mentioned that the problem could be USB speed can not handle duplex mode: with recording and playback both happening at 24/96."
I'm wondering why there is even a configurable entry for INPUT in the Mac's AudioMidi control utility in the first place since this is a DAC ???
It's not, it's simply there in the USB receiver so your OS picked it up. From the bunch of information I gather about Nuforce USB receiver on the UDAC-2 and the HDP, I say very likely they use the Tenor 7022L chip for them, which has input like that and does not support 88.2KHz sample rate.