x RELIC x
Headphoneus Supremus
That's. . .wow um. . .seriously? That's actually LESS powerful than the X3ii, half as powerful actually, and only 40% as powerful as the X3ii. Why exactly would they make their far more expensive flagship player be significantly less powerful than their earlier, lower-end players in its stock configuration? I get that the module is supposed to be for IEM's and all that, but that doesn't and shouldn't preclude the possibility of it having a higher power output nonetheless.
Could it be. . .is this Fiio's version of an attempt to get us to buy extra stuff like the other amp modules? That would be pretty annoying, if that's the strategy they're using here as a business.
Edit: I've seen many companies that use various strategies to try to coerce people into having to buy extra stuff ratehr than just giving them what they need right off the bat, but I never would have expected such a strategy from a wonderful company like Fiio. Not gonna lie, I'm a bit disappointed.
Further Edit: I do have to wonder. . .are there any options out there for a DAP that would have the same level of SOUND as something like this, but without all the added bluetooth and wifi functionality and stuff like that which I won't ever actually use? Because all I really need is something that can play music files from internal and micro-SD or SD memory. I have no need for all that extra functionality similar to what smartphones have.
The thought is that most people would want to use IEMs or efficient headphone on the go so they included the IEM amp module. You really don't need much power to drive most headphones. Example, the new ALO Rx has its output maxed at 28mW and it drives my IEMs extremely well. I only need to turn the volume up 1/8 of the total and it starts to get loud. I honestly don't think it's consumer gouging that they are doing. I'll be testing the X7 with a variety of headphones shortly, as will others, so I suggest people cool their jets and wait for impressions first.