JimmyTryhard
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2014
- Posts
- 111
- Likes
- 23
Please, please I am NOT trying to start an MP3/192 vs. FLAC argument I'm just curious what makes the X5 attractive if you're not already on the FLAC train? That's kind of how I landed with X5 - I already rip everything to FLAC, pained me to compress just on principle, tired of converting to ALAC on Ipod, I can take 256gb on the go which is quite adequate, the form factor of Pono is just too cute for it's own good and Astell and Kern is just too damned expensive ....
Sorry if I was misleading, but what I meant is that I used the program called "mp3tag" to re-tag all of my music files, including file formats such as FLAC. The program is not limited to MP3 files.
As for the filesize controversy, I am really not one of those heated debaters. I personally cannot hear a noticeable difference when comparing 256+ AAC/320kbps MP3 and FLAC, although I do actually have quite a few FLAC albums in my library. I am not saying that there is no difference; it's just that for my personal purposes, I choose to occasionally use compressed files for more space. I only use a 64 GB card at the moment.
To me though, the X5ii is attractive because it solves all of the problems that I had with my iBasso DX50 with class and style. That unit made very loud popping sounds and had a more ugly, impractical design. With the X5ii, I really enjoy the aesthetic of the player and the general usability of the buttons/wheel. It's reminiscent of a previous time without retaining the 'outdated' feel. I also don't have much disk space left on my smart phone, an iPhone 5S, so I tend not to use that for portable music these days.
The sound also is one of the main selling points for me of course; I spent $400+ on my IEM setup, so I want to get the most out of their source too!