[FiiO M6] Portable High-Resolution Lossless Music Player,Embracing A Wireless Future
Mar 12, 2019 at 1:21 PM Post #1,726 of 3,610
Mar 12, 2019 at 4:23 PM Post #1,728 of 3,610
Hi, I would like to ask if this player would play smoothly big one file albums in FLAC as I have my collection in single image flacs, often 192/24, so it's no wonder filesize can be a couple of GB's. Would this player playback this material smoothly? Given no wireless would be turned on.
 
Mar 13, 2019 at 9:02 AM Post #1,731 of 3,610
Oh, that's comforting. :D

Think I'm going to contact Amazon...

UPDATE - got a response from AVGear that they have an on going investigation with Canada Post to track down 80 packages that have gone missing from them the day our M6's shipped. So, I guess I'll give it a bit more time...
Thanks for the update, I had e-mailed them but did not get a response. I'm still a bit skeptical, but here's to waiting more! :beerchug:
 
Mar 13, 2019 at 5:29 PM Post #1,733 of 3,610
Hi, I would like to ask if this player would play smoothly big one file albums in FLAC as I have my collection in single image flacs, often 192/24, so it's no wonder filesize can be a couple of GB's. Would this player playback this material smoothly? Given no wireless would be turned on.

Yes, you shouldn't have issues, provided the microSD card is of good quality, like Sammy, Sandisky, or such . I am not noticing issues with my 1-hour FLAC albums

i sent you the files, let me know if they play and decode.
tnx

Just tested, works alright. Reads the song, all the tags, cover art, works flawlessly as far as I can tell :)
 
Mar 13, 2019 at 8:51 PM Post #1,735 of 3,610
So it natively decodes MQA?

It opens the files @iridium7777 sent me, I have no idea what those files are, and I don't know how to get more offline MQA files, but if the files check out and if they are MQA, then yes.

I got two files that can be played by M6 without any issues :)

Basically, those files look like normal FLAC files to me, so I'm not sure what makes them MQA or not (?)
 
Mar 13, 2019 at 9:11 PM Post #1,736 of 3,610
i sent you 2 MQA encoded files, the Rateliff file is 24/44 and should decode to 24/88.2, the London orchestra file is 24/48 and should decode all the way up to 24/192.

What does the player say it's playing? If it says 24/44 or 24/48 then the M6 does not decode MQA natively and essentially any MQA claims are false.

If it says it's playing 24/88.2 or 24/96 or 24/192 then it's a real MQA decoder.

post a screen shot please,
Tnx


It opens the files @iridium7777 sent me, I have no idea what those files are, and I don't know how to get more offline MQA files, but if the files check out and if they are MQA, then yes.

I got two files that can be played by M6 without any issues :)

Basically, those files look like normal FLAC files to me, so I'm not sure what makes them MQA or not (?)
 
Mar 13, 2019 at 9:49 PM Post #1,737 of 3,610
i sent you 2 MQA encoded files, the Rateliff file is 24/44 and should decode to 24/88.2, the London orchestra file is 24/48 and should decode all the way up to 24/192.

What does the player say it's playing? If it says 24/44 or 24/48 then the M6 does not decode MQA natively and essentially any MQA claims are false.

If it says it's playing 24/88.2 or 24/96 or 24/192 then it's a real MQA decoder.

post a screen shot please,
Tnx

Okay, so I don't have a lot of experience with MQA, and I've no idea where you got them, but if the files are 24/44 and 24/48, why should they decode to other sample rates? How?

I can guarantee you there's no information above 24/48 on either file, just by using a simple frequency analysis tool. Maybe send the files to someone else who can test what is inside them. To me, to Foobar2K, and to Audacity, a very used audio tool, the files are normal FLAC files.

I don't mind saying FiiO is wrong, if they are, but the files you sent me look like this

upload_2019-3-14_3-46-12.png
 
Mar 13, 2019 at 10:28 PM Post #1,739 of 3,610
2A675B1E-A5E9-46B7-8265-344FAD7E94E5.jpeg F4AF36D3-6723-4D13-8A45-91E10426874C.jpeg 48E542F9-8CBE-44E0-90E8-8D0A07D1239F.jpeg 25BC2AB8-CB30-4589-99F6-A6AE8ED5F63B.jpeg MQA is coded below the normal flac level and the info is there. your frequency plotter does not decode MQA so all it sees is the regular flac file.

do you have something like dragon fly red or any other DAC that actually supports MQA? if so, play that file with that and see that it'll get encoded.




Okay, so I don't have a lot of experience with MQA, and I've no idea where you got them, but if the files are 24/44 and 24/48, why should they decode to other sample rates? How?

I can guarantee you there's no information above 24/48 on either file, just by using a simple frequency analysis tool.
 
Last edited:
Mar 13, 2019 at 10:29 PM Post #1,740 of 3,610
Okay, so I don't have a lot of experience with MQA, and I've no idea where you got them, but if the files are 24/44 and 24/48, why should they decode to other sample rates? How?

I can guarantee you there's no information above 24/48 on either file, just by using a simple frequency analysis tool. Maybe send the files to someone else who can test what is inside them. To me, to Foobar2K, and to Audacity, a very used audio tool, the files are normal FLAC files.

I don't mind saying FiiO is wrong, if they are, but the files you sent me look like this


I think the decoder should 'unpack them' to a higher bitrate if I understand it correctly and it should say mqa I believe.

I guess not all daps can unfold them all the way. I remember the ak guy said the sr15 could unfold them all the way, weird. The only place I know to get them is Tidal anyways.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top