I'm planning to enter Fiio's cable promotion and here is my evaluation of the FH3 in the context of other iems I'm familiar with.
Good job! I'm too lazy to take 6 pics lol.
I'm planning to enter Fiio's cable promotion and here is my evaluation of the FH3 in the context of other iems I'm familiar with.
Thanks, I may well give it a go then.I‘d consider listening to the T2+ before making any decisions. It’s certainly not “better“ than the FH3, but it is different. It has more of a “neutral with boosted bass” signature. I find it has noticeably more treble extension and quantity, which you may or may not like.
I don't find the treble offensive in any way whatsoever, even maybe a little too smooth and I am not a treble head at all.Is the treble peak at 8khz bothersome? The treble area seems a bit uneven which is concerning. I prefer neutral/smooth response, I'm worried this will be bother me.
Looking at some measurements - something like the Andromeda seems lot more even and smooth in the frequency, even with it's slight sparkly treble peak.
Sorry to bring this up again, but in terms of technicalities how does the FH3 and N3 compare? I'm quite confused because others say that the N3s are better. I just want to know your opinion.As that user, I’ll try to expand on this a little bit. I find both the N3 and the FH3 to have very enjoyable bass with the FH3 having an edge in detail and speed, and the N3 leading in sub bass quantity and extension. The N3 has an overall darker tonality with a slight roll off of the highs that is not due to a lack of detail, but instead my attention with respect to the frequency range is drawn more to the bass region as my focus. It usually lets you know it is there at all times.
The FH3, on the other hand, is more mid forward and I immensely enjoy male and female vocals on it but it also has the ability to surprise you with a sudden, dynamic bass hit. It is a lot of fun in this respect. It works well with most everything I have listened to. It is a great all rounder given it’s flexibility with music genres, fit/finish and accessories, and price.
Hope this helps
What are your feelings in detail retrieval and isolation? I don’t want to lose out on the detail the FH3 gives me, I would be willing to sacrifice a little isolation though. I do feel some additional treble would not go amiss.- I‘d consider listening to the T2+ before making any decisions. It’s certainly not “better“ than the FH3, but it is different. It has more of a “neutral with boosted bass” signature. I find it has noticeably more treble extension and quantity, which you may or may not like.
Don’t forget to do step 2, post your review on AmazonI picked up the FH3 from Amazon a few days ago, and am happy with my purchase. I'm planning to enter Fiio's cable promotion and here is my evaluation of the FH3 in the context of other iems I'm familiar with.
This past year, I rediscovered iems after a 20 year absence from the scene. Things have changed a lot since the days of Circuit City and The Good Guys (okay, maybe more than a 20 year hiatus). I tested many options, noted below, so you can get a frame of reference.
But I quickly tired of the heavy OH10s falling out of my ears, so tried to make a custom mold using radians. I made a mistake, clogged the tube filter, and was on the hunt for a replacement (since the OH10s have been out of stock at Amazon for a long time).
- My favorite iem is the ikko OH10. I was drawn to its musical presentation of instruments which sound natural and full. The sub-bass rumble and defined highs made it an even more enjoyable listen.
- I flat-out don't like: Final 7200 (soulless, no energy, but very analytical), Legacy 3 (boomy bass, instruments sounded not-quite-right), YGF-ISS04 (just a mess).
- I could see how others might like these, but they sounded off to my ears - either too thin/tinny or fake/plasticky sounding: FD1, KXXS, Shozy CP3 and Form 1.1, T2+.
- I liked these, but they were not as "good" as the OH10: Yamaha EPH-200, Tape, FH5, JVC/Drop HA-FDX1.
The FH3s are less expensive, much lighter, have better ergonomics, a more solid cable, and come with better accessories. I enjoy the sound just slightly less than the OH10s, but they are on the same level. The FH3 bass is very good, but compared to the OH10, it is slightly boomy with just a bit less sub-bass rumble. Vocals are every-so-slightly more recessed and I hear a slight "grain" in the vocals. The vocals on the OH10 sound true, as if someone was simply singing next to me, but the FH3 sounds like a recording - a great recording, but still not the same experience. Treble on the OH10 gave me a slight problem at higher volumes, but the FH3 has the detail I'm looking for without any discomfort. The number of "wow" moments I have while listening to music is about the same as the OH10s. But take all this with a grain of salt since my OH10s are broken and I cannot do a side-by-side comparison. When it comes down to it, I have a slight preference for my memory of the OH10 sound, but what good are they if such a hassle to wear (tried lots of different tips, but not spinfits)? If possible, I suggest trying out the both OH10 and FH3; they are similar styles of headphones and both great options. (All listening done on qudelix-5k)
But if you want to know the truth, you've got to follow the money. I'm keeping my FH3s and not waiting for the OH10s to come back in stock. The FH3 is a great iem - I would purchase it over any competitors under $300. I haven't tried anything over that price, but I doubt there is a magical "next echelon" of iems which exist just above $300, so I'm sure the FH3 would compete in the $300+ range as well.
Some photos:
[Earhooks are comfortable and sturdy, but mmcx connectors are extremely tight and I have yet to remove the cables.]
[Beautiful design. Light but durable.]
[Non-removable filters]
[Ergonomic fit.]
[Surprise! Left looks identical to right.]
[Cable is springy and wants to be straight, but I don't find it bothersome. Doesn't tangle. Looks very nice and sparkles under the right light.]
I think the detail retrieval and resolution of the mids and treble are quite similar between the two. The bass resolution and texture is better on the FH3. I consider the T2+ and FH3 complementary, but I don’t know if you only want one IEM.What are your feelings in detail retrieval and isolation? I don’t want to lose out on the detail the FH3 gives me, I would be willing to sacrifice a little isolation though. I do feel some additional treble would not go amiss.
Yeah my budget is limited so I'm trying to find an all-rounder. Sounds like it's worth giving the T2+ a shot at least though. Thanks very much for the help.I think the detail retrieval and resolution of the mids and treble are quite similar between the two. The bass resolution and texture is better on the FH3. I consider the T2+ and FH3 complementary, but I don’t know if you only want one IEM.
Both can serve as a single all-purpose IEM, but it is really hard to beat the FH3 in this capacity.Yeah my budget is limited so I'm trying to find an all-rounder. Sounds like it's worth giving the T2+ a shot at least though. Thanks very much for the help.
The harder question is whether the FH3 is worth 3x the price of the T2+, law of diminishing returns seems like it kicks in early with this hobby.Both can serve as a single all-purpose IEM, but it is really hard to beat the FH3 in this capacity.
Well, only you can decide that. There is no wrong choice between these IEMs.The harder question is whether the FH3 is worth 3x the price of the T2+, law of diminishing returns seems like it kicks in early with this hobby.
I think it, as always comes down to what you listen to and how you use them. Technically, the increased perception of detail is better on the FH3 for me as I tend to listen to more vocal focused music and its more forward presentation suits that compared to the more recessed midrange on the N3. This holds true for the treble as well where there is more emphasis with the FH3 - neither is in any way overly sibilant or fatiguing.Sorry to bring this up again, but in terms of technicalities how does the FH3 and N3 compare? I'm quite confused because others say that the N3s are better. I just want to know your opinion.
OK, well this might be easier than I expected. I'm actually shocked at how similar the FH3 and the T2+ are. The T2+ punches above its weight in general, and the bass response is much more potent than I expected based on the FR graph (some of this might be based on the fact that the T2+ seems to fit my ear better than the FH3). Edit: upon further listening, I actually find the T2+ to have more overall bass quantity (though still a little lower quality), but my FH3 unit might have some sort of defect because the quantity just doesn't match up to what other reviewers are reporting at all.Well, only you can decide that. There is no wrong choice between these IEMs.
Pretty hard to find these in Canada.. Anyone know where there is some in stock?