MrJudasPriest
Head-Fier
I feared the bass may be too light but it's fantastic. I do default to the bass filters but that's more to do with taking the treble down a tad.
are these bass heavy like the fh5?
What source are you using them with? I take it you’re not a huge bass fan?I just got mine a few days ago. I find the bass a bit heavy and too forward. I think the word "strong" really defines the bass on FH7. Similar to Denon D7000, where the bass is controlled but main character of the show.
I'm hoping with burn-in the bass will settle down and tighten up more. The treble tip helped a little bit, but I'm hoping burn-in will help mellow out the bass and let the mid/treble shine more.
Edit: To shed more light on my preferred sound sig, I know many reviews find the FH7 bright, but I think it's fine. Seems relatively neutral to me, maybe just a hint of brightness
What source are you using them with? I take it you’re not a huge bass fan?
These are probably the least ‘bassy’ IEMs FiiO has made. I find bass tight, controlled, textured and balanced. It has a real kick, but no hump and zero bleed. More sub than mid-bass emphasis. Highs are definitely more emphasised, even with bass filters. All of this using the M11.
Edit: tips make a huge difference to bass and brightness. I’m using Spiral Dots, which will have less bass warmth and smoother treble than foam tips, for example.
I just got mine a few days ago. I find the bass a bit heavy and too forward. I think the word "strong" really defines the bass on FH7. Similar to Denon D7000, where the bass is controlled but main character of the show.
I'm hoping with burn-in the bass will settle down and tighten up more. The treble tip helped a little bit, but I'm hoping burn-in will help mellow out the bass and let the mid/treble shine more.
Edit: To shed more light on my preferred sound sig, I know many reviews find the FH7 bright, but I think it's fine. Seems relatively neutral to me, maybe just a hint of brightness
so your saying the fa7 has same bass slam as the fh5 what about all the other area,s the mids/highs? and does this have deeper tube for easier ear seal?I find the FH7 bass spot-on. One of the best I’ve heard in an IEM. You might find them a little light if you enjoy a thick mid-bass though (like the FA7). Same as the FH5, emphasis is more on sub-bass and linearity rather than mid bass humpiness.
The FH7 has about the same bass slam as the FH5, but deeper and with more control. The FH5 is probably a touch more elevated in the sub-bass, with the mid-bass on both being equal. In both cases the mids aren’t affected by the bass. The FH5 mids are more forward and can sometimes be ‘shouty’, depending on the track, whereas the FH7 mids are more balanced in the mixes and not quite as forward. The FH7 is slightly brighter and much more extended in the treble though, whereas the FH5 still has air and sparkle but the treble is more grainy and a touch rolled off. Sibilance isn’t an issue with either IEM.so your saying the fa7 has same bass slam as the fh5 what about all the other area,s the mids/highs? and does this have deeper tube for easier ear seal?
I just got mine a few days ago. I find the bass a bit heavy and too forward. I think the word "strong" really defines the bass on FH7. Similar to Denon D7000, where the bass is controlled but main character of the show.
I'm hoping with burn-in the bass will settle down and tighten up more. The treble tip helped a little bit, but I'm hoping burn-in will help mellow out the bass and let the mid/treble shine more.
Edit: To shed more light on my preferred sound sig, I know many reviews find the FH7 bright, but I think it's fine. Seems relatively neutral to me, maybe just a hint of brightness
..or mind. Blind ABX or bust on said “reason” of such claims.Unfortunately the perceived tonal deviations don't reflect themselves in the FR graphs – at all! But the same applies to electronics components, which according to their virtually-flat frequency responses should all sound the same (and refuse to do so).
Don't bother, just keep an open mind! Frequency response is not all that matters. That said, cable sound is an absolute mystery and should not exist (to that extent – read 1.6 dB and the llike). But it clearly does to my ears.
Mids and highs of the FH7 are clearer but also slightly brighter overall. That said the FH5 mids are more forward, and highs are just a touch rolled right at the top. The FH7 is more resolving.how is the mids/highs clarity vs the fh5?
is it still slightly warm? i like my headphones/iems to lean slight warmMids and highs of the FH7 are clearer but also slightly brighter overall. That said the FH5 mids are more forward, and highs are just a touch rolled right at the top. The FH7 is more resolving.
Hey no! We don't do blind ABX tests nor discuss them in this part of the forum. Go to the Sound Science forum if you feel like it...or mind. Blind ABX or bust on said “reason” of such claims.
That said, mind matters to music enjoyment so.. yeah, personal experience can change independently of any actual perceivable physical change.
Maybe a hair above neutral. Definitely not dark!is it still slightly warm? i like my headphones/iems to lean slight warm
That’s right! Why would we want to muddy our opinions with facts?Hey no! We don't do blind ABX tests nor discuss them in this part of the forum. Go to the Sound Science forum if you feel like it.