[Damz87]

Are they the same size as the „stock“ tips (Final E)?

I am using the stock tips in „L“, will the SpinFit in L be the same or do I have to chose larger/smaller ones? Thanks

EDIT: It seems the SpinFits are a little larger, so Final-E in L would be more likely SpinFit in M?

Final E, size L:

• L = height 10mm, outer diameter 12mm

SpinFit, size M:

• M = height 11mm, outer diameter 12mm

I assembled this together from different sites (Amazon, 46 Audio). Not sure if reliable.

Yeah I would say try M on the SpinFit. I also usually use L for final E and I’m using M for CP155

 

[CharlyBrown]

Yeah I would say try M on the SpinFit. I also usually use L for final E and I’m using M for CP155

Thank you, just ordered M

 

[fabio19]

But .... the fact that you read few reviews / opinions on the EE ESR MKII depends on the fact that it has not had much response or because it is the EE iem that comes out a bit out of the ordinary having a lower low range than the other EEs. lacking?

 

[Mehran]

Guys, is there anywhere in Europe to repair EE IEMs? The LX drivers have come loose in one the earpieces , and one or more drivers have stopped working too unfortunately.

 

[Deezel177]

'Not an EVO-related post, but e-earphone just posted another pic of a custom ODIN, and I think it shows off those Bifrost faceplates a lot better than their previous post did. 'Gorgeous work from the EE team, as always

 

[gLer]

Guys, is there anywhere in Europe to repair EE IEMs? The LX drivers have come loose in one the earpieces , and one or more drivers have stopped working too unfortunately.

As far as I know they need to go back to EE. PM @Jack Vang or @JoshWatkins and they'll sort you out.

 

[Mehran]

As far as I know they need to go back to EE. PM @Jack Vang or @JoshWatkins and they'll sort you out.

Thanks, I emailed their support team. They have responded already. Have to fill out some form and go through the process now.

 

[KuroKitsu]

'Not an EVO-related post, but e-earphone just posted another pic of a custom ODIN, and I think it shows off those Bifrost faceplates a lot better than their previous post did. 'Gorgeous work from the EE team, as always

Valknut on both faceplates! Just when I finally convinced myself the different logos on the unis were okay. Arghhhhh

 

[rwelles]

I'm not sure that I'm getting sufficient sub-bass on my Odin customs. I've run them for 200+ hours. Is that enough time for the W9+ driver to get up to speed??

 

[CL14715]

I'm not sure that I'm getting sufficient sub-bass on my Odin customs. I've run them for 200+ hours. Is that enough time for the W9+ driver to get up to speed??

How much sub bass are you getting?

 

[GiullianSN]

How much sub bass are you getting?

That’s a hard question to answer without a measurement rig…

 

[CL14715]

That’s a hard question to answer without a measurement rig…

Well I don’t mean precisely lol! Just wondered if he heard anything in the sub registers at all.

 

[GiullianSN]

But .... the fact that you read few reviews / opinions on the EE ESR MKII depends on the fact that it has not had much response or because it is the EE iem that comes out a bit out of the ordinary having a lower low range than the other EEs. lacking?

I think is just a more specific usage compared to the reviews and audiophile target, where most of people are looking for the next TOTL.

 

[CL14715]

But .... the fact that you read few reviews / opinions on the EE ESR MKII depends on the fact that it has not had much response or because it is the EE iem that comes out a bit out of the ordinary having a lower low range than the other EEs. lacking?

To be quite honest, I don’t even think a majority of folks know why the ESR exists and what’s it’s purpose is.

The ESR is meant to be a flat, ultra reference studio monitor with fast transients for mixing. The EVR was meant as a vocal monitor and EE outfitted a lot of church choirs and other vocalists. I think the issue is people assume these are for general musicality, which they are not.

 

[KuroKitsu]

To be quite honest, I don’t even think a majority of folks know why the ESR exists and what’s it’s purpose is.

The ESR is meant to be a flat, ultra reference studio monitor with fast transients for mixing. The EVR was meant as a vocal monitor and EE outfitted a lot of church choirs and other vocalists. I think the issue is people assume these are for general musicality, which they are not.

Nailed it! This should be the go to blurb when audiophiles ask about the ES/VR.

They're not intended to be for general unless studio reference is your thing.

If anything they're straightout sucessors to the Spartan IV with more specialization in the EVR's case. I've used the Spartan IV as a reference studio and EDC when I started out.

They're now in the hands of a friend, and I've since moved on to another studio reference mostly due to my bass and trebles.

However, I still recommend the ESR MKII for those shopping for a lower on the bracket but still ToTL studio reference tuning. Especially if a mid bass bias is more your cup of tea.

But .... the fact that you read few reviews / opinions on the EE ESR MKII depends on the fact that it has not had much response or because it is the EE iem that comes out a bit out of the ordinary having a lower low range than the other EEs. lacking?

There are a lot of things that have few reviews or opinions IE. QDC DMagic, MMR Balmung. But are fairly good.

Correlation =/= causation

The ESR simply isn't an audiophile iem at heart and isn't marketed as such.

@riverground has an excellent review posted over on ear-fidelity for the ESR MKII that matches with my impressions of it as well.