BananaOoyoo
1000+ Head-Fier
Finally got to try them both yesterday! Although... I was at the store to try out a lot of new/new-ish IEMs, so I only got 10-15 minutes with each. Just enough to get a really, really initial impression of each, and I will definitely return at some point to try out all these IEMs again. Emphasizing the "really" here because I didn't have enough time with either and because people will always jump in to say "but you didn't have time to make detailed impressions and so the comment is worthless" if the impressions aren't absolutely glowing. (Happened on the Solaris thread.)
Valkyrie seemed appropriately positioned in the X-series lineup as an upgrade from the entry level Bravado but a clear step down from the flagship Legend X. The unit size/fit is excellent, and I really like the Dragonhide faceplate (looks better in person than online). My take on the Valkyrie was really that it needed more drivers, as the W9 dynamic driver seemed much more powerful than the BA or Sonion EST drivers. Given the not-insignificant $1600 price tag, might suffer from a bit of middle-child syndrome like the Vantage and Nemesis. It felt like a downgraded Legend X (much less oomph) with a splash of the Phantom, and if it came down to it, I'd save up the extra to just get the Legend X. Less driver flex than the LX though, which is nice.
Wraith is huge... but still manages to fit decently. I didn't love the idea of a purple IEM, but in person, it's subdued and adds a nice dash of color. Definitely feels like the spiritual successor to the Zeus, and it's a bit unfortunate that the store doesn't carry older EE IEMs for a side-by-side comparison. (They do have the EE x EA Arthur, but I'm not sure how much of a change there is between that and the original Zeus XIV/R) Basically, it's the opposite end of the spectrum as the Valkyrie - the 4 EST drivers do work here, and overall, I'd classify it as a neutral-bright IEM. I think the fact that the Zeus is the most natural comparison says everything about the resolution and detail retrieval of the Wraith. Elephant in the room is once again the price tag - at $3500, even if you're big on cable differences and love the EA Cleopatra at $700, I'm not sure if the Wraith is worth 3x the Zeus XIV, which was already near the top of my personal IEM list. I don't know how much of a SQ jump you get here. More worthy flagship EP-series model than the Phantom IMO.
EE x EA King Arthur is either out for review or broken, so it wasn't available yesterday. Oh well...
A lot of local reviewers/listeners were pretty down on either/both the Valkyrie and the Wraith, but I didn't think that either IEM was bad. It feels like Empire is going down the right path in general here.
I still want to see what happens when you throw in a W9 subwoofer (or two) into the Wraith though. Ditch the flat but anemic BA bass you get from the 2 low BAs and give me that satisfying rumble of the LX. (Incremental progress I guess?)
Valkyrie seemed appropriately positioned in the X-series lineup as an upgrade from the entry level Bravado but a clear step down from the flagship Legend X. The unit size/fit is excellent, and I really like the Dragonhide faceplate (looks better in person than online). My take on the Valkyrie was really that it needed more drivers, as the W9 dynamic driver seemed much more powerful than the BA or Sonion EST drivers. Given the not-insignificant $1600 price tag, might suffer from a bit of middle-child syndrome like the Vantage and Nemesis. It felt like a downgraded Legend X (much less oomph) with a splash of the Phantom, and if it came down to it, I'd save up the extra to just get the Legend X. Less driver flex than the LX though, which is nice.
Wraith is huge... but still manages to fit decently. I didn't love the idea of a purple IEM, but in person, it's subdued and adds a nice dash of color. Definitely feels like the spiritual successor to the Zeus, and it's a bit unfortunate that the store doesn't carry older EE IEMs for a side-by-side comparison. (They do have the EE x EA Arthur, but I'm not sure how much of a change there is between that and the original Zeus XIV/R) Basically, it's the opposite end of the spectrum as the Valkyrie - the 4 EST drivers do work here, and overall, I'd classify it as a neutral-bright IEM. I think the fact that the Zeus is the most natural comparison says everything about the resolution and detail retrieval of the Wraith. Elephant in the room is once again the price tag - at $3500, even if you're big on cable differences and love the EA Cleopatra at $700, I'm not sure if the Wraith is worth 3x the Zeus XIV, which was already near the top of my personal IEM list. I don't know how much of a SQ jump you get here. More worthy flagship EP-series model than the Phantom IMO.
EE x EA King Arthur is either out for review or broken, so it wasn't available yesterday. Oh well...
A lot of local reviewers/listeners were pretty down on either/both the Valkyrie and the Wraith, but I didn't think that either IEM was bad. It feels like Empire is going down the right path in general here.
I still want to see what happens when you throw in a W9 subwoofer (or two) into the Wraith though. Ditch the flat but anemic BA bass you get from the 2 low BAs and give me that satisfying rumble of the LX. (Incremental progress I guess?)
Last edited: