EA Signature Series ā
Cadmus 8-wire (left) / Ares S 8-wire (right)
About a month and a half ago, Iāve graciously been given the opportunity to demo EAās new signature series cables ā namely, the 8-wire version of their ubiquitous Ares-S and Cadmus that have been exceedingly popular within the entry market. To give some context, these were originally limited edition cables that were introduced last Winter as a special āChristmas bundleā ā ālimitedā... until there was an influx of demand to make it a permanent option by those who were already fans of the original 4-wire version. This is what I call a true symbiotic relationship: one in which a company profits by responding to the calls of the market. And its eye catching price makes it easier to digest as one of the cheapest 8-wire cables offered by a major competing brand. In my previous Code 23 review, I urged companies to start taking steps to lower the price floor that bars newcomers from entering the hobby, so thank you EA for continuously taking consideration of the general audiophiles whose funds may be more limited than the most hardcore and devout enthusiasts.
With that being said, Iād like to share my impression of EAās newest Signature series cables that I hope everyone would find of value. This has taken an embarrassingly long time to get to, so thank you
@JordonEA for the patience and generosity given. And as always, this is just one audiophileās impression so please take it as a grain of salt
Cadmus 8-wire
Ares S 8-wire
Ares S 8-wire (copper) / Cadmus 8-wire (SPC) Impressions ā
(40hrs. burn-in)
Tested on Sp3K + Rs8 ā Viking Ragnar
Ares-S and Cadmus 8-wire have a powerful and robust sound. They aim for a much more upfront and full bodied presentation than the lean and delicate touch of their flagship counterparts. There is this sense of boldness that conveys a gesture of weight and body, but it's not one that I find overpowering to be inducing fatigue. Rather, itās some sort of gestalt that seems to help in its dynamic delivery traversing from one note to another. Both cables pose a hint of high-clarity vividness ā but one that leans closer to a tonal quality rather than an assertion of technical competence. These have been the general descriptions so far, in which they showcase quite a few similarities here and there. But they do have their intrinsic differences that denote back to their cable geometry, which is where Iād like to affirm from here on out that they are most certainly complementary in spite of a few shared DNAs.
Ares-S is a pure copper cable whereas Cadmus is a silver-plated copper cable. Moving beyond their obvious aesthetic difference, Cadmus aims for a leaner and brighter presentation with a slightly more emphasis in the upper frequency and less volume in midbass quantity. Their center-imaging is quite different as well, in which Cadmus effectively disperses notes better across the stage, whereas Ares-S sounds more confined within the center of my head. This helps Cadmus give the impression as a ālighterā and ethereal sound between the two ā but keep in mind ālightā is relative only within the context of this comparison. Cadmus 8-wire is still more weighted in body than cables like Chiron. The beauty of Ares-S comes in its pure copper-timbre, as it's closer to a warm vivid tonality that captivates you in an emotive hi-fi richness rather than serenading you in a heated chocolatey fervor. Both cables have some sort of a vivified persona that I find them teetering the lines of maturity and excitement at the same time.
If youāre fan of the original 4-wire versions, you can best be assured that the difference going from 4-wire to 8-wire remains primarily in its technical knack and presentation. Their tonal character remains almost identical, so you can most certainly imagine that youāre essentially getting the same flavor. The 8-wire versions (for both Ares-S and Cadmus) offer a fuller, grander, and more forward presentation that elevates its dynamics by at least a notch. Both the 4-wire versions are comparatively leaner whereas the 8-wire versions have more grunt and physicality in their attacks. The āupgradeā is less of an elegant refinement and more about injecting steroids to the overall presentation. If this may be of appeal for you, I would most certainly recommend the 8-wire over the original 4-wire versions.
Code 23 (Pentaconn OFC variant) ā borrowing from a friend @KKNAYANA
Ear Hooks
With the release of the 8-wire Signature series, Iāve seen quite a few Head-fiers ruminate between Code 23 and the reinforced Ares S and Cadmus cables.
Code 23 (Pentaconn OFC variant) has a comparatively neutral tuning that poses a striking balance from sounding neither too lean nor full. To my ears, it is one of the cleanest and most color-less copper cables Iāve heard that ventures in line from entering any colorful tonality. āReference-like neutralityā is how I would describe its signature, and it adamantly places itself ahead of the Signature series in every technical department. There is a noticeable enhancement in its detail retrieval where Iām āseeingā its scenic landscape in a cleaner and more resolving manner. Vocals come across more revealing without any forceful elevation of the frequency; and instruments position themselves more precisely in their own respective compartments. Thereās simply more space and air in its presentation, neither of which I can give as much praise for the Signature series. Code 23 excels in providing a more holographic imaging, whereas the Signature series stays constrained to the conventional X and Y-axis soundfield.
If I had to categorize the three cables :
Tonal character
Cadmus 8-wire (bright-āerā) ā Code 23 (neutral) ā Ares-S 8-wire (warm)
Technicality
Code 23 (1st) ā Cadmus 8-wire (2nd) ā Ares-S 8-wire (3rd)
Weight / Ergonomics
Cadmus 8-wire = Ares-S 8-wire ā Code 23 (heavier and more rigid)
Amongst the three, my personal fit issues with Code 23 have resorted me to using Cadmus 8-wire the most. But strictly for audiophile listening, I very much prefer the clean and revealing signature of Code 23.
Iām a strong advocate of synergy when it comes to attaining musical phenomena. Iāve yet to come across a single cable that ādoes the deedā in every possible pairings. Thus, this is my reminder that none of the aforementioned cables supersede one over another as each holds a unique attribute thatās appreciable as its own. For those who are curious, I would encourage to give them a trial as they are a statement piece that one does not need to spend an exorbitant amount to enjoy music. All three cables are excellent in their own rights and I wouldnāt hesitate to recommend them to any newcomers who would like a taste of how cables can enhance a sonic performance.
Thank you so much for reading and I hope this was informative to anybody who has been curious
Always very humbling to be able to share a piece of my thoughts with everyone.