Latest Thread Images

EarSonics' two flagships: the universal S-EM9, and new custom EM10.
Dec 13, 2015 at 12:05 PM Post #361 of 1,260
FLC 8s and Sm9 comparison:

Bass in sm9 narrowly ahead.
There is equality in the sub-bass.
Sm9 vocals, vocal and instrumental complexity because it is in front of the instrument can be experienced.
FLC 8s' vocals and instruments as they are in the same position, instrument and vocal discrimination sm9 above.
Again in the ring, fuzzy guitars and drums 8s, clear and realistic than sm9 giving these instruments.

Sm9 the scene, but far ahead 8s' FLC little wider than the vocals does not mean playing a scene because width.
FLC 8s instrument of discrimination and the very high level of realism.
There Sm9 on instruments in the event of a slight ghosting or treble pitch.
Again sm9 the stage depth, due to the little heard of rear instrument, FLC lags behind 8s again.
 
Dec 13, 2015 at 12:16 PM Post #362 of 1,260
[
fbac75e2a17630ec4d40ab51040b9849.jpg



4ef38e7125be5c502fdcee4a56d8db1e.jpg

7707222c241466531430ccc0840c7ca1.jpg

b6b889c545485c2488139385cacd7b8c.jpg

http://images.tapatalk-cdn.com/15/12/13/c749385b92e0f6306f4026e3cecf7de7.jpg[/IMG
[img]http://images.tapatalk-cdn.com/15/12/13/c30c50fb425fac47829a47ce4e19418e.jpg
1da5b4138f1c54319eb349e4417ca5c4.jpg
df065bfba115526949fb803e8b32c66d.jpg
9e760cf94b03b6b06cd8f79fb5c07a96.jpg


LG-H815 cihazımdan Tapatalk kullanılarak gönderildi
 
Dec 14, 2015 at 3:18 AM Post #365 of 1,260
tokengesture said:
Was listening to Boatmans Call by Nick Cave last night through mojo. Quite stunning. Great emotion in the voice, wonderful bass
Click to expand...

 
I just listened to it, blissful :)
 
I find that with the Mojo vocals are way more forward than with the ZX2, also better detail and texture... and bass are just the right amount, what strikes me is how bass is impactful even at low listening level... Definitely a very good pair with S-EM9!
 
Dec 14, 2015 at 3:39 AM Post #366 of 1,260
karanehir35 said:
FLC 8s and Sm9 comparison:

Bass in sm9 narrowly ahead.
There is equality in the sub-bass.
Sm9 vocals, vocal and instrumental complexity because it is in front of the instrument can be experienced.
FLC 8s' vocals and instruments as they are in the same position, instrument and vocal discrimination sm9 above.
Again in the ring, fuzzy guitars and drums 8s, clear and realistic than sm9 giving these instruments.

Sm9 the scene, but far ahead 8s' FLC little wider than the vocals does not mean playing a scene because width.
FLC 8s instrument of discrimination and the very high level of realism.
There Sm9 on instruments in the event of a slight ghosting or treble pitch.
Again sm9 the stage depth, due to the little heard of rear instrument, FLC lags behind 8s again.
Click to expand...

 
Hi, just to clarify, are you saying the soundstage and imaging of the S-EM9 are better than the FLC8?
 
Dec 14, 2015 at 3:40 AM Post #367 of 1,260
davidmolliere said:
  I find that with the Mojo vocals are way more forward than with the ZX2, also better detail and texture... and bass are just the right amount, what strikes me is how bass is impactful even at low listening level... Definitely a very good pair with S-EM9!
Click to expand...

 
When you say that, does that mean the sound sig isn't U-shaped anymore?
 
The Mojo is a beast of a device.
 
Dec 14, 2015 at 5:24 AM Post #368 of 1,260
ezekiel77 said:
When you say that, does that mean the sound sig isn't U-shaped anymore?
The Mojo is a beast of a device.
Click to expand...

 
I haven't listened to many sources with the S-EM9 yet, but out of the ZX2 the sig was clearly U shaped although very much less so than with the Velvet. With the Mojo it's not flat but pretty much a very stretched U with slightly prominent bass and upper range. The mids are also more balanced as in the lower mids dip is not as apparent. Then again I would need to get a listen on different quality sources to get a definite feeling on the S-EM9 tuning.

But Earsonics published sound sig makes sense with the Mojo, except I would put the dip in lower mids instead of high mids and I would say it's more permissive than recording dependent and I would say it's more whole than detailed in the presentation. Also soundstage has better depth than width.
 

 
Dec 14, 2015 at 5:29 AM Post #369 of 1,260
Thank you. Explained perfectly.
 
Dec 14, 2015 at 11:49 AM Post #371 of 1,260
Considering the post above if SM9 has as "shining treble" as "Velvet" that's a complete disaster. Who is taking these decisions in Earsonics to make so horribly sibilating earphones like Velvet and ?maybe? SM9?
 
Dec 14, 2015 at 11:55 AM Post #372 of 1,260
Haha hi buddy, glad to see you've joined us here. I know how you feel about the Velvet, but the S-EM9's treble is much smoother. I think according to the graph, the upper midrange dip refers to the 5 khz spectrum and is specifically to reduce sibilance, another trademark of ES, although the upper midrange is forward and exciting. Alltogether, the S-EM9 does not have a great deal of sibilance and is much smoother than the Velvet. I will do some testing for treble energy later on. But it suffices to say the S-EM9 is not a 'horrible sibilating earphone' 
wink.gif

 
Dec 14, 2015 at 12:14 PM Post #373 of 1,260
What is the cable connector used?
 
Is it the 2-pin or MMCX, or a custom connector?
 
Can someone post pictures of the connector?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 4 (members: 0, guests: 4)
Back
Top