CutzNClickz
New Head-Fier
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2015
- Posts
- 10
- Likes
- 17
Probably, you are right about the change of sound signature and the whole sound presentation-the bass became more aggressive, though I still don't find it smeared or bloated (at least on my modded DX 90). And even the vinyl rips I considered mild and relaxing now sound tiresome because of more aggressive lows (the treble is ok, as I perceive it)/
As for the new 10 Band EQ, many people on Russian forum don't share your optimism, because it was reported (and verified by oscillograph measurements) that the equalizer specified bands frequencies are incorrect and when moving an equalizer slider you are adjusting the sound in the band other than the specified one (allegedly, the adjustment results sometimes are even stranger than the ones, which consider such shift). I guess the EQ on DX90 is just condemned to suck...for all eternity (and better be consigned to oblivion)
Ok, to make it a bit clearer, i am not optimistic about this EQ. I know it's only a "cheap" graphic EQ and not
a parametric or better a Linear Phase EQ ( you´ll never see a Linear Phase EQ on such a device, too much
CPU Power needed ).
But a funny thing to read the bands don't hit the spot...
I was wondering about the spreading of these 10 bands. The most of them are used to equalize the lowend !
And hello, we don't need these Lower spreadings to get rid of some room modes .
A better spreading for the mid and upper frequency bands like :
20Hz - 80Hz - 250Hz - 500Hz - 1kHz - 2kHz - 7kHz - 10kHz - 14kHz - 18kHz (17kHz for Lurker0) were more practical and better Settings for every Lows / Mids / Highs.
Or iBasso did this, giving us the tools to take some dBs back of the prominent bass...