H20Fidelity
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2012
- Posts
- 16,289
- Likes
- 6,779
I'll be demoing DX90 in coming weeks, I think it's the safest approach for me before dropping $400+ AUD on a unit.
I'll be demoing DX90 in coming weeks, I think it's the safest approach for me before dropping $400+ AUD on a unit.
You have the dx50 right. You will definitely like the dx90 I hope. I havent heard the dx50 but am sure there are improvements. Upon auditioning both the dx90 and the zx1. I thought the dx90 appealed to me alot more. I dunno why but I thought the zx1 sounded just like my HTC one, thats how they sounded to me with the tracks I had. But it was a brief period of audition so I probably didnt do it good justice.
No, they don't. If you manage to connect with adb to the player, you'd see them all active in the list of processes.
Actually, faster start with my changes is mostly exactly due to removed asian fonts. They are 2x20MB!
I'll post a description in a better (than Google-translated by you) English later
Based on what I've read here, I've kept my DX90 at 2.0.0 and have been very pleased with the sound (unamped, into a Shure 846) for about a month now.
That is, until I switched back to my old Sansa Fuze (pictured below). As much as I don't want to admit it, the sound is cleaner and more extended through the the Fuze. Is it time for me to experiment with the other FW versions?
Does burn in changes the dx90 significantly? Because I am already loving how they sound. I just wonder how a sound can be better improved than this. Never tried the Aks lineup yet.
Yes, I own DX50, and going from my experience with Sony Walkmans (but not ZX1) don't find the comments about the iBasso being superior hard to believe. DX90 will need to have a much better headphone out than DX50 for me to spend my money. Otherwise I'll just keep amping my DX50.
I for one did not believe that burn-in would affect the sound of electronics devices until recently. I always assumed that burn-in does affect electromechanical devices such as speakers. After all, there are no moving parts in electronic devices.
However, I was definitely able to hear a change in sound from my DX90 over time. I have TG334s. They sounded great the first couple days, then the sound seemed to get thin, with a definite reduction of bottom end. It was peaky in the upper mids also. I didn't like the sound at all.
So I plugged my DX90 in and played Track 9 of my XLO burn-in CD for 2 weeks using the supplied burn-in harness. It was tough not to listen to my new DX90. But after 2 weeks of burn-in, I heard a distinct improvement in the sound. The bass had returned and the whole frequency range was smoother.
I don't know why it sounds better but it does. I guess if you think about it, the audio path is routed through thousands of PN junctions, many more than other music players due to additional op amps and the buffers. And every PN junction operates by the physical movement of doping medium within the silicone (I'm an EE).
So my advice is if you don't like the sound of your DX90, try the burn-in even if that is against your religion.
Good contact is especially critical for low voltage signals such as the DX90 HO. On the flightline we can often clear a fault by simply disconnecting and reconnection all the connectors in the relevent signal path.
Jamato you wrote "Caig for batteries..." is this a misspelling, it is driving me crazy trying to figure out what you said.
Good contact is especially critical for low voltage signals such as the DX90 HO. On the flightline we can often clear a fault by simply disconnecting and reconnection all the connectors in the relevent signal path.
Jamato you wrote "Caig for batteries..." is this a misspelling, it is driving me crazy trying to figure out what you said.