[heyysanadiyom]

When I bought dx90, I immediately sold zx1. With my Roxanne's it's just sound better.

 hımmm I am going to buy DX90   

    it is over

 

[musicheaven]

 

 hımmm I am going to buy DX90   

    it is over

You give up very easily.

 

 

[heyysanadiyom]

 
You give up very easily.

 

Yes , I agree with you
 
for example in my life , I bought vsonic gr07 mk2  , sound was very good  but gr07 cable wasn't   suitable for me ...

 I mean cable is huge  than 2 weeks later ,  I sold it 

 
 
another example is you know  that   DX100  ,  Sony F886 , and finally DX90  

maybe tomorrow  DX 1500   

  who knows? 

 

[musicheaven]

 
Yes , I agree with you
 
for example in my life , I bought vsonic gr07 mk2  , sound was very good  but gr07 cable wasn't   suitable for me ,  I mean cable is huge  than 2 weeks later ,  I sold it 

 
 
another example is you know   ,  DX100  ,  Sony F886 , and finally DX90  

maybe tomorrow  DX 1500   

  

No worries - as long as you enjoy the hobby, that's all that matters. Me, I love pleasing my ears.

 

[ubs28]

Will DX90 work as a DAC / Amp for Mac? I see they are working on the Windows side. 

 

[pOOB73]

  Will DX90 work as a DAC / Amp for Mac? I see they are working on the Windows side. 

A driver for OSX is uncertain at least.

 

[jamato8]

  Will DX90 work as a DAC / Amp for Mac? I see they are working on the Windows side. 

They will try, from what has been said. Maybe I will send them my Mac. lol would love to have it work with Mac. Maybe I will get Parallel software for my mac and I can run Windows on it and there you go! I want to run Windows for some apps anyway. 

 

[Mython]

  Maybe I will get Parallel software for my mac and I can run Windows on it and there you go! I want to run Windows for some apps anyway. 

 
 
I have been quietly wondering about this, but my old Mac is a G4, so I don't know how well newer Intel-based Mac function using Windows Emulation (substantially better, I presume, but, generally-speaking, ports do not usually emulate well).
 
I suppose the most successful method might be to just go ahead and install Win7 32bit as a Dual-Boot configuration, alongside OSX.

 

[jamato8]

   
 
I have been quietly wondering about this, but my old Mac is a G4, so I don't know how well newer Intel-based Mac function using Windows Emulation (substantially better, I presume, but, generally-speaking, ports do not usually emulate well).
 
I suppose the most successful method might be to just go ahead and install Win7 32bit as a Dual-Boot configuration, alongside OSX.

The Parallels actually for most, works better and is faster as you can go back and forth on one screen and you don't have to use Boot Camp. I spoke with a Mac tech guy and he much prefers Parallels over all the other software and over Boot Camp. I don't think the G4 is going to work though. I plan on getting a new MacBook Pro very soon. I will run Parallels. The only thing is, from what I have read, when you upgrade your Mac OS, Parallels doesn't work on the new OS. 

 

[bainkel]

Hi. Where do you buy your DX90, from amazon or directly from ibasso?

 

[RainHeaven]

  Hi. Where do you buy your DX90, from amazon or directly from ibasso?

 
Depends on where you live. If you live in the U.S., you can get it from Amazon from the seller ProStudio Sound & Music and delivery should be faster. Outside of U.S., you can buy it from iBasso since they ship internationally but beware of customs.

 

[TheMaestro335]

Depends on where y
ou live. If you live in the U.S., you can get it from Amazon from the seller ProStudio Sound & Music and delivery should be faster. Outside of U.S., you can buy it from iBasso since they ship internationally but beware of customs.

I bought mine from Ibasso I got it I. 3 days! I live in NYC

 

[wickson]

Dropped my dx90 and dinged the bezel, sending it back to iBasso for repair.
Gonna have to buy a dx50 to hold me over, not many in the for sale section though.

 

[headwhacker]

FW v2.0.0 and Roxanne's sound much better then v2.0.5.

 
Funny, I liked it the other way around. Roxanne and 2.0.5 with slow roll-off. in comparison, 2.0.0 is too analytical on Roxanne. Very sharp details with very distinct instrument separation. It's feels like its a big soundstage and so many empty spaces between each elements (instruments) in the music.
 
2.0.5 on slow roll off makes Roxanne sound like filling those empty spaces a bit without making details overlap. Of course, some may think that the sound is somewhat muddier. But to my ears, Roxanne has never sound this natural while maintaining high detail resolution and good imaging.

 

[headwhacker]

   
 
I have been quietly wondering about this, but my old Mac is a G4, so I don't know how well newer Intel-based Mac function using Windows Emulation (substantially better, I presume, but, generally-speaking, ports do not usually emulate well).
 
I suppose the most successful method might be to just go ahead and install Win7 32bit as a Dual-Boot configuration, alongside OSX.

 
Parallels and VMWare are in mature state now to a point that dual-booting a Mac doesn't make sense anymore. I used parallels to run Windows and all hardware I hook up through USB works like a charm on virtualized Windows. But I am not going to use Windows just to run DX90 as a DAC. I have not upgraded my parallels yet so it runs on Maverick. To be honest I don't want to go back to Windows. Everything I used now are available in MacOSX. Except the USB DAC for DX90.