DigitalFreak
镇老鹰
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2011
- Posts
- 7,076
- Likes
- 774
Quote:
Is it ever my friend
It wouldn't be affordable then, would it?
Is it ever my friend
It wouldn't be affordable then, would it?
I've not been able to get my clip zip to work with the 64 gd card from Sandisk. Also don't really care to rockbox on a non stable build of that software.
Thanks though...
It wouldn't be affordable then, would it?
Let me see if I have this straight. to mate a small mobile HDD to my DX 50 I would need a Micro USB B/Male to USB2.0 A/Female OTG Cable, specifically the cable pictured below. Correct?
Since we're talking small portable HDD's anyone got any recommendations on anything around the size of 256 to 500 GB's in size? I would want something built in such a way so it's shock proof and as tiny as possible. THIS looks rather promising but I'm worried it might be a little to big and defeat the purpose of being mobile. My kingdom for an affordable 256GB USB stick.
Affordable? Check this out. I had my father purchase a few to use with his new MBP and they're absolutely fantastic.
Edit: the link! http://store.apple.com/us/product/HA676ZM/A/lacie-256gb-rugged-usb-30-thunderbolt-series-ssd-hard-drive
Well if you add a 320 HD, you find yourself with a DAP larger than the DX100, that does not sound as good and might have less battery, just to have greater capacity at a cheap price...not too convincing an offer is it
I would rather keep the portability factor and swith sd cards given that 64 micro sds are not so expensive...
Doesn't sound as good based on what logic? And might have less battery? It's most definitely going to have less battery if it's spinning a platter around at 5,400RPM through the USB port.
Well there is no way that ibasso is going to put out a 239$ DAP that sounds as good as their TOTL 830$ DAP. So a DX50 will not sound as good as DX100. iBasso will tell you so if you ask them. Based on the logic of Descartes.
For the battery I have no clue. But adding an HDD will definitely shorten battery life significantly.
I thought ibasso declared the DX50 will be a non compromise DAP which will not be inferior sonically to the DX100.
I thought ibasso declared the DX50 will be a non compromise DAP which will not be inferior sonically to the DX100.
I thought ibasso declared the DX50 will be a non compromise DAP which will not be inferior sonically to the DX100.
well, that'd be too good to be true...