average_joe
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2008
- Posts
- 5,394
- Likes
- 299
Quote:
Welp the wait is over here! Got my customs yesterday evening and have been listening all day. Average_joe was pretty on par with these as far as his impressions go. Speaking of I'm sorry for all the fitting issues you're having caracara08 but my impressions were returned with the monitors and they fit perfectly. Compared to the SM3 I'd say these definitely sound better though it may be a more upgraded sound than just flat out better. It is the same kind of heavy sound signature with less emphasis on the low and low midrange. These phones tend to have a very deep and responsive low end without being too intruding. When the bass is needed it is certainly there, when it isn't, well it just isn't. They are quite warm and I can understand some listeners taking that for "cloudy" or "muffled" but to be exact they are just on the warmer heavier side of sound. There really isn't anything thin or analytical about them. I have listened for a few hours straight now and notice no fatigue at all as I do from say my ER4Ps. The midrange is forward, quite lush, and very smooth. There is a slight bump in the highs but not nearly to the extent of the Ety's. If the frequency response on the SM3's is very bass heavy and then quickly rolls off after the midrange the Aud-5x is like a W. There is a slight bass hump, noticeable midrange bump, and a very slight high frequency bump. Where the SM3 is very heavy and seems like it has a lot of headroom, due to the rolled off high frequencies, the Aud-5x is more involving and accurate with respect to where the instruments are. These come very close to my k340's which are a bit brighter oddly enough, somehow I just wasn't expecting that. Overall these are quite nice and I'm very impressed with how they sound. Our of my iPhone they aren't the best, a little muddy, but with a portable (I'm using a TTVJ slim) they really shine. They are also very easy to drive. For those who like a lot of high frequency this is not the monitor for you. Yes there is a bump up there but they roll off fairly severely around 18k if not before. Anyway, hope this helps those who are waiting or deciding whether or not to buy.
Thanks for sharing. Give them a week if not two and then go back to the SM3 and see if your thoughts change. As far as the treble extension, 18K is pretty good for a CIEM in that price range, and they offer the best extension I know of for that price. For example, the 1964-Q drops off at 16K (and appears to be on the darker side, probably closer to the SM3).