I liked the bass of the HF150.And which one you like more?
And I felt the HF150 Pro sounded as boring as the so-so earbuds.
(I lost both of them in the disaster now...)
I liked the bass of the HF150.And which one you like more?
Interesting point, haven't thought of it before. When you orient it upwards, there is much more free space for the vent, this is the main reason of the change in signature isnt it?I did not mean the direct contact of the shell and the wire of the voice coil, but the point of pressure on the part where the opening is.
That's why some shells have a small cut.
For me, the best soundstage that I have heard so far.I liked the bass of the HF150.
And I felt the HF150 Pro sounded as boring as the so-so earbuds.
(I lost both of them in the disaster now...)
Great collection you have there.
I didn't try Blur buds, but I'm curious: are they really that much better than say 400ohm and 150ohm "red film" models?
Are you solved the issue with 130ohm Bery? I forgot to mention one more easy solution to reduce the highs.
Cut a round piece of medical mask and putt as first layer over the openings on the driver cover, then full foam over and donut at the end (donut is optional).
Visit this post to see changes. I tested only one layer, but you can use more.
On this post you can see how this piece need to look like (see paper filter on image)
And post some pictures of mod, don be shyI've just added a piece of mask on both. It's better, a way more enjoyable to me . Need time to listen to them before review my leader board
If you are that crazy about the HE150, why don't you buy it below by using an agent?For me, the best soundstage that I have heard so far.
No BS with tuning and shells, just simple black cable, MX500 and horseshoe foam.
I broke my HF150, it was very special to me I still keep them in a bag, maybe I'll decide to fix them
Not really. The shell at that point has a slope and directs the sound wave down towards the stem opening. Along the way it encounters obstacles: driver housing, cable. This is a very narrow space, although we think the depth of the shell is large. Also, stem vent is always sealed with cable and a small portion of the air passes thereInteresting point, haven't thought of it before. When you orient it upwards, there is much more free space for the vent, this is the main reason of the change in signature isnt it?
Thick lips puts pressure on the outer edge of the cover so that cracking often occurs but in most cases not driver failure.Most shells don't have this cut, only the ones that have thick lips that potentially get close to the voice coil.
Also, MX500 silver , gold and red shells don't have this cut. You can make this cut with scalper or a small file.One exception for example the dp100 shell which is indeed notorious for breaking the voice coil. This is my theory anyways
The frequency graphs does not look so bad. Only some high extension is missing. What is the driver diameter in these?And measurements. These bugs have an L-shape sound signature
Driver size: | Frequency response: | Impedance: | Sensitivity: |
---|---|---|---|
16mm | 8Hz-25KHz | 16ohm | 107dBdB |
Only that Is not bad, but it's far away from good. I didn't measure diameter. Around 14mm probablyThe frequency graphs does not look so bad. Only some high extension is missing. What is the driver diameter in these?
Are these the drivers you're talking about?This is the update to previous post about 64ohm full Ti HP.
First with Teflon tape I wrap naked part of wire near connection with driver.
I dampened fake side ports with small pieces of EVA foam
Little gaps on the side of the black shrink tube are now stuffed with cotton, and I added cotton inside the tube.
The top piece of horseshoe foam was removed from the shell and placed on top of the driver.
Violet curve represent new tuning. Bass is slightly reduced and is tighter and mids and treble are bring back from "darknes". Bass still plays a major role here
YupAre these the drivers you're talking about?