I think that's the key. The D16 is a powerhouse and if you're just using IEMs, I don't think it's worth the extra spend. If you like detail/shimmer the Clarinet is the better choice in my opinion. I also own the DC-Elite and I could not for the life of me distinguish it from the D16. The DC-Elite is an incredible dongle dac/amp.I use only IEMs, but high end. In general they don't need ultra high end source
Latest Thread Images
Featured Sponsor Listings
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Dethonray Clarinet - Portable DAC/Amp Discussion + Impression thread
- Thread starter pradiptacr7
- Start date
DingDongMonster
500+ Head-Fier
I try to be more careful when recommending things that are 4 figures. A person with a 3k IEM, 1k cable is going to hear things someone on a $300 set is not.I use only IEMs, but high end. In general they don't need ultra high end source
The clarinet on the other hand is much easier to confidently recommend. It sounds amazing and price tag is that of a dongle.
DingDongMonster
500+ Head-Fier
Totally valid. Even in my circle of friends. We have different preferences. Some swear by the one bit Dac for the its organic naturalness. But it’s going to lose out in terms of technicals and extensions to the sigma delta chips. I had the DC Elite and it’s a beast of a dongle.I think that's the key. The D16 is a powerhouse and if you're just using IEMs, I don't think it's worth the extra spend. If you like detail/shimmer the Clarinet is the better choice in my opinion. I also own the DC-Elite and I could not for the life of me distinguish it from the D16. The DC-Elite is an incredible dongle dac/amp.
Mimouille
Headphoneus Supremus
I was afraid the Elite would sound to analytical. Was more looking at the Cayin RU7 before the ClarinetI think that's the key. The D16 is a powerhouse and if you're just using IEMs, I don't think it's worth the extra spend. If you like detail/shimmer the Clarinet is the better choice in my opinion. I also own the DC-Elite and I could not for the life of me distinguish it from the D16. The DC-Elite is an incredible dongle dac/amp.
It is extremely reference but boy does it sound goodI was afraid the Elite would sound to analytical. Was more looking at the Cayin RU7 before the Clarinet

Mimouille
Headphoneus Supremus
I feel that most of the music I will listen to these days is streamed, ansd even when it is flac or highres, if the recording is not up to par, having something that is TOO reference just makes the music worse.It is extremely reference but boy does it sound good![]()
You are right. I use a 3.5 to 3.5 AMP cable, connecting Fiio X2 Coax out to Clarinet, it works!The cable could not work! If the cable connect to clarinet, mean the signal connect to Ground. So you could hear a noise then no sound out.
The picture from @fx88 means clarinet is an unambiguous design , If there is COAX signal input for either the left or right channel, it can be received.
So the best way is a RCA output from source ,then use the clarinet RCA TO 3.5 adapter.
For L&P DAP, a customized cable is neccessary. If the source uses a 4-section plug with multiple functions, it can easily cause compatibility issues.



The Clarinets were sold out quickly through Hong Kong's sole agent, too.

Mimouille
Headphoneus Supremus
Better than the Clarinet?It is extremely reference but boy does it sound good![]()
Been listening to Clarinet for 2 weeks. Coming from M1, I think it has some M1 characteristics but in a smaller scale. It’s a powerful little portable amp, dethronray house tuning and dark background etc. I started listening with the stock firmware and via USB-C. Meanwhile Anson encouraged me to try out coax / opt. Then things got exciting after I updated the latest firmware (v 30/12/24 - rhapsody), I noted slightly more note weights, Anson confirmed that the latest firmware squeeze more power, up to 0.5db increase. Also, the sound profile changes under coax, it sounds analog and smooth. I’m still exploring the coax setups, curious to try out opt as well.
Attachments
Excellent news! Thanks. I'm still waiting for my Clarinet to arrive - I opted for the SMSL PO100 as well. I'm curious if there's any difference between using Coax versus Optical. I ordered both cables for the sake of experimentation.Been listening to Clarinet for 2 weeks. Coming from M1, I think it has some M1 characteristics but in a smaller scale. It’s a powerful little portable amp, dethronray house tuning and dark background etc. I started listening with the stock firmware and via USB-C. Meanwhile Anson encouraged me to try out coax / opt. Then things got exciting after I updated the latest firmware (v 30/12/24 - rhapsody), I noted slightly more note weights, Anson confirmed that the latest firmware squeeze more power, up to 0.5db increase. Also, the sound profile changes under coax, it sounds analog and smooth. I’m still exploring the coax setups, curious to try out opt as well.
The RU7 is remarkable, I primarily stream from Apple and Qobuz, but buy a lot of music too. It is a great dongle, the best I've used. I am curious about the Elite, but I have too many portable sources as it is.I feel that most of the music I will listen to these days is streamed, ansd even when it is flac or highres, if the recording is not up to par, having something that is TOO reference just makes the music worse.
Mimouille
Headphoneus Supremus
how does it compare to the clarinet? oops saw you don't have it yetThe RU7 is remarkable, I primarily stream from Apple and Qobuz, but buy a lot of music too. It is a great dongle, the best I've used. I am curious about the Elite, but I have too many portable sources as it is.
I'll advise once the Clarinet arrives and I've had some time with it.how does it compare to the clarinet? oops saw you don't have it yet

DingDongMonster
500+ Head-Fier
SMSL. PO100. Plug and play. Easy like ABC.
Did a quick AB test. Everything is the same, just USB direct, or through the SMSL box. Instant audible difference.
Optical via SMSL is rich, thick note weight, upper mids is lively.
Direct USB. Sounds thinner, separation and imaging are less precise. Less rich overall tone. Bass also doesn't slam as hard.
iBasso's coax out still sounds better to me. But this is a $30 box. So, no reason to be nitpicking a few percentage points.
Did a quick AB test. Everything is the same, just USB direct, or through the SMSL box. Instant audible difference.
Optical via SMSL is rich, thick note weight, upper mids is lively.
Direct USB. Sounds thinner, separation and imaging are less precise. Less rich overall tone. Bass also doesn't slam as hard.
iBasso's coax out still sounds better to me. But this is a $30 box. So, no reason to be nitpicking a few percentage points.

Users who are viewing this thread
Total: 6 (members: 0, guests: 6)