rb2013
Author of The 6922 Tube Review
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2013
- Posts
- 5,930
- Likes
- 514
No takers on the Supra 2.0 USB 2M cable I listed - dropped the price to $29.
Doesn't anybody want to try this?
Doesn't anybody want to try this?
Yes, always having fun![]()
I had some troubles getting I2S input AK4495SEQ working with RPI and Amanero board. Finally decided to put back isolated XMOS which works (and sounds) perfectly.
Btw, abandoned Jplay, since I am in SinglePC mode now, JPlay isn't of any use anymore. It even seemed to degraded SQ on this SinglePC (the HP laptop),
so I must say, you were right![]()
Will try RPI with my other AK4495SEQ dac's (NO DSD). Thanks for the RuneAudio tip, but I prefer headless player, so will try PiCoreplayer which also supports RPI3 by now![]()
The Ian FiFo II is a comprehensive reclocker which rebuilds I2S completely. Ian has a little board to connect to RPI, so you don't need HifiBerry DAC+Pro for it's I2S signal.
The FiFo also needs an isolator board between FiFo II and DAC.
Other interesting projects are the "Direct DSD" projects from Acko and Nautibuoy at diyaudio
Nautibuoy's project: http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/digital-line-level/273474-best-dac-no-dac.html
Acko's Direct Drive DSD project: http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/group-buys/280763-direct-drive-dsd.html
Acko's Amanero/Reclocker project: http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/group-buys/227502-amanero-isolator-reclocker-gb.html
Wont comment on jplay and risk tbe wrath of the 'goldenear' hordes![]()
Afaik all those audio 'optimized' rpi distros are headless. But the picoplayer one seems to be the slimest indeed. And btw most distros use Mpd as player. Slim, headless, low level and comes with clients for all phone/tablet/pc os-es http://mpd.wikia.com/wiki/Clients. I'd say you should give it a try.
Ianfifo sounds like the best device for your project: cheap, small and fully customizable on all levels. Hope to hear more about it from you soon.
As about the direct-dsd 'dacs' that sounds like a great idea too. IIRC, lampizator has a pricey & well reviewed device which works exactly like that. Only problem here is the pcm2dsd conversion on rpi. Not sure if there any good convertors for linux .. and it could be too hard a job for the small rpi-s. But I guess it has to be tried first.
Have a great weekend. Hope you have the same amazingly sunny weather there.
You may try these:
V3.20.0版本:http://pan.baidu.com/s/1V7oJG
V2.26.0版本:http://pan.baidu.com/s/1ntDUtqp
Sorry to sorta double-post, but this seems like the more relevant DDC-related thread. I am looking to use the latest and greatest driver that is compatible with the U12 where I can simply install it and have it work (no changing UIDs or PIDs, etc.). I'm currently using the 2.26 one, but based on what I've read, there are sure to be better options? Or, is no one using the U12 anymore?
Or should I just return the U12 and get something else. I honestly can't tell the difference with or without it...
Thx for the 3.2 link, those things are almost impossible to google. At least for non chinese speakers. Will try it asap.
The 2.26 driver works very well in my setup, never had any glitches (and I have 3 other usb audio drvs on that winpc).
You should try 3.20 but dont get your hopes up much. If there is any SQ improvement, most probably it'll be very small.
In spite of all the hype posts, the DDCs arent exactly the promosed universal usb cure .. pc, dac, power or even (extremeley rarely) cables can make a difference. Unless you have a seriously screwed digital setup (e.g. very old pc or usb dac, big power issues, etc) you will not hear any of those advertised 'nigh & day' diffs. And could very well be that yoir pc usb is already clean enough or you dac cleans it very well and there are no SQ improvements to be had. In fact I bet most people wont hear a ddc improvement.
What I hear from my (heavily modded u12) is a bit of extra bass and a slight improvement in sound 'roundness' and maybe even detail. But it's all quite subtle and I wont bet on a blind test.
So .. give the box some settling time and try to a/b it carefully 1-2 times. If no diffs and you still want to try, I would recommemd a puc2lite. Hard to quantify the diffs clearly but the puc2 in my setup just sonds more powerful, enjoyable & 'musical'.
Good luck.
The Ian FIFO II is not that cheap as you think, it needs isolator board and DACBOARD too, so including shipment we are talking about something in the range of $300.
But, this would be best option for now, sadly no DSD, so, not sure if I have to wait for Ian's DSD project![]()
The Ian FIFO II is not that cheap as you think, it needs isolator board and DACBOARD too, so including shipment we are talking about something in the range of $300.
But, this would be best option for now, sadly no DSD, so, not sure if I have to wait for Ian's DSD project![]()
I took closer look at the HifiBerry DAC+ board and see there is already a MCLK generator and they are using the ES9023's PLL to do the reclocking. More importantly I think the special driver is already in Linux and in the Picoreplayer distribution.
One other reason you may have had trouble with the 4495 initially is that the formatting of the I2S stream is for the ES9023, check the 4495's manual to see if it different and the Hifiberry guys may be able to tell you the format they used or if you are able, read the kernel driver source on Github for the exact setup they used for the ES9023.
If you get the Amanero isolator board, all the necessary I2S lines are there, DIYINHK gives out the PCB for free, you pay shipping.
Basically, if you do the the following RPI ->Amanero Isolator->DAC+ Pro->AK4495, you have an alternate to Ian's FIFO reclocker except you save $300.
PS: I think you get DSD as we are dealing with just the bit stream, check with HiFiberry to make sure they did not touch the DoP header
Hahahaha, yes, better not mention JPlay![]()
There indeed are many distro's who could compete with PiCoreplayer, but that is something I will try later on. First things first, have to have a good hardware setup.
The Ian FIFO II is not that cheap as you think, it needs isolator board and DACBOARD too, so including shipment we are talking about something in the range of $300.
But, this would be best option for now, sadly no DSD, so, not sure if I have to wait for Ian's DSD project :wink_face:
About Direct DSD: I would let PC handle conversion, NOT rpi since it obviously hasn't enough cpu power to do the trick.
I read your post today, the weather wasn't bad but not as promised,,,,, so only 2 hours of sun yesterday, rest of weekend was really cloudy :confused_face:
Hi, yeah, I totally agree with you on everything. I've had the U12 for about a month and a half now. My PC is a very high-end gaming PC that has about 7k worth of parts, but I don't know if any of that benefits audio. I use Fidelizer Pro, which I think makes a difference.
Maybe I need to do some more A/B testing before I return the U12 (if I still can). I guess there is the peace-of-mind and/or placebo factor of having a DDC, among other things, in my chain, but I certainly don't have golden ears, short term audio memory or whatever some folks seem to have to be able to decern all these subtleties between devices.
My main gripe is the U12 doesn't have the traditional driver support of similarly-priced hardware. It's like this thing is an afterthought to their other products. Or, maybe this is normal for DDCs in this day and age?
Thanks for your recommendation on the PUC2Lite.
Your 7k super gaming rig may be a bit much. Generally, 'optimize for audio' is done by eliminating/disabling every single unused pc component, both hw and sw .. also regulated LPS power, nofan, etc. Whether those 'optimizations' make any diff is almost impossible for anyone to say in advance .. although many will tell you the night&day story. Hard to say if your pc has anything with the non-existing SQ diffs. Btw what dac?![]()
The drv situation is same for pretty much all china ddc-s discussed around here. My guess is that they are not paying the thesycon licence. But the shady drivers are working very well and the u12 is prolly the best.. dont remember seeing any complains.
And btw if you can/want to order from EU, there should be some cheap puc2 on ebay.de .. about €200 IIRC
No problem. Glad you found some of my post to be useful or informative.
I recommend the intona over any device of its kind. Which are USB cleaners, reclocker , regen, isolators for power. But this intona is one of about 2 or three products that does isolation of the USB data. It uses two Spartan fpga' to break down and rebuild the data from the dirty to clean side.it's a great piece of gear to own if you use USB at all. Simply put, it will give you the most out of your USB.
I have owned everything you can imagine from the Uptone regen, jitterbug, wyrd, etc etc. sold all of them except r wyrd, which is what my wife uses on her setup.
her psu in the computer had a noisy 5v USB line that is around 15mV-20mV
My psu is about 7-9mV and too noisey for me. That's why I got the dedicated Paul Hynes lps for the Paul pang ocxo v3 usb3.0 card... I could of saved a grip of money if I just got the intona. As it lets regular USB ports sound 98-99% as good as with the ppa3 ocxo and Hynes lps. Kinda frustrating. But true.
So that's why I recommend itcheck it out! The guts are impressive too.![]()
![]()
I am now almost pushing the BUY button.
Might go for the standard version.
If I understand you right, with the Intona before my ddc I will not need anything else in the chain between pc and ddc?
I can remove that Aqvox usb psu?
It´s feeding the ddc with cleaner power.
Maybe later buy a better 19v linear psu to my Intel NUC, or is that also overkill with the Intona in the chain?
I am now almost pushing the BUY button.
Might go for the standard version.
If I understand you right, with the Intona before my ddc I will not need anything else in the chain between pc and ddc?
I can remove that Aqvox usb psu?
It´s feeding the ddc with cleaner power.
Maybe later buy a better 19v linear psu to my Intel NUC, or is that also overkill with the Intona in the chain?