No, I didn't post any thorough impresssions yet. I've posted my initial impressions in this thread and in the BA4f review of marleybob. My first impressions are as follows:
a) my BA4r requires approx. 2 db decrease in 60-250 Hz regions and 1db in 30-60 Hz region. Decrease in 60-120 Hz gives more clarity in the highs; decrease in 120-250 Hz gives more clarity for vocals. After those small adjustments my BA4r have this clarity which I was looking for; at the same time they have this nice power/impact and the sound is full (it isn't thin at all as I would expect from reference monitors). Without those adjustments my first impressions were that my BA4r have some sort of veil, in particular in the upper midrange/highs region;
b) as regards direct comparison between my BA4r and ER4s:
- my BA4r have much more fuller sound with a little more impact;
- due to this fullness of my BA4r I tend to think that ER4s are a little bit thin and have somehow a little bit artificial bump in the upper midrange (this bump gives ER4s this superb clarity), although in the ER4 appreciation thread someone suggested that this lack of fullness of the Etys sound results rather from a little bump in 2-4 kHz region and not from the bump in the upper midrange. Previously I considered ER4s as a neutral IEM, but now I start think that BA4r is the neutral one and ER4s is more on the cold/thin side;
- detaility is on pair, maybe BA4r portrays more details, but it is too early to confirm this for sure. Definitely, I can hear more subbass, this rumbling subbass, on BA4r which I've nevered heard of on Etys;
- soundstage is on pair, maybe BA4r plays more in the head instead of behind it.