Christer
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Nov 23, 2015
- Posts
- 1,957
- Likes
- 1,991
Not a huge Brendel fan myself but skimming through that masterclass honestly don't find his manner particularly offputting or out of place. Sometimes these publicly shared classes are presented more for the audince entertainment/education using the students as a prop but I think Brendel seems more interested to getting into the guts of the piece/performance. At least in my limited experience of music instruction it's fairly common didactic style*- senior music students will likely already be thick skinned with it- and seems fitting for a masterclass where the relationship w/ the student is more or less impersonal, there are time constraints, and one of the primary advantages of which is getting an up close technical view on how a particular master plays a particular thing.
*not to suggest that it's always a good/effective style
Good post! I fully agree,and as a beginner pianist but rather seasoned music lover, and ex teacher I enjoyed this masterclass like many others.
Ok, telling the budding pianist, pupil that he played certain parts as if he was bored may not be the kindest thing to say ,but maybe it made him "listen up" and pay more attention to things he was understating and had played a bit mechanically before Brendel explained and most importantly, showed, how he preferred these parts played.
Showing by example is imho the best way to teach music interpretation.
And only musicians who actually play an instrument very well themselves, can do that. There are things in music that simply can not be explained in words.
I'm not sure I buy Brendel's explanation of those introductory Gs intended to sound as tympani strokes,but they sure sound nicer that way than the hard hitting way the student initially played them imho.
I also liked how Brendel really stressed the syncopations.
But my one and only recording of this work is a Philips LP with Claudio Arrau and he really dug into those deep bass passages and syncopations.
Since I absolutely suck at sight reading sheet music, I often turn to Synthesia tutorials on YT to learn or at least get a taste of the parts I can learn of such superhuman, from a technical point of view, works as Liszt's Sonata.
Here are two I found :Insane Piano Piece - Liszt Sonata in B minor - YouTubePiano Sonata in B minor // LISZT [Piano Tutorial] (Synthesia) - YouTube
PS. As usual I personally haven't really made it past the intro and selected beautiful melodic passages of the first movement. But Synthesia can be a great shortcut to get started. And gradually it gets more and more easy for me to "read" synthesia before actually playing it, than notes in unkown sheet music.
When as in Liszt's Sonata I for example see a g octave or a melody line rolling down in synthesia I can sort of hear it coming before it happens,but the little black dots on, or between the lines on white paper are more difficult for me.
No,I did not teach music.
My own formal musical training was extremely basic and I never played any instruments in my youth.
Thanks "heaven" or rather YT, for Synthesia.
Finally,to get back on the topic of Masterclasses,I mostly find them very interesting indeed, and watch loads of them, both piano and conducting classes like the recent ones from the Concertgebouw with Ivan Fischer, a conductor I have watched closely in rehearsal and at sessions and who impressed both there and then, and equally much, with the conducting students at the Concertgebouw.
I especially enjoy Barenboim's Masterclass series on the Beethoven sonatas which imho, reveal a lifetime of learning and experience with those masterworks.
Cheers CC
Last edited: