uzi2
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2013
- Posts
- 1,638
- Likes
- 478
So, two questions...
If source direct is always best, why was there a popularisation of headphone amplifiers in the first place (when you could just as easily use the jack in the CDP, speaker amplifier, or MP3 player)?
Is anyone naysaying this absolutely sure that the load characteristics for any amplifier are the same as any other? Multi crossover IEMs handle substantially differently to a single dynamic driver, and I can say as an EASY to observe fact that the Pure II+ can drive the Layla's more cleanly (treble opens up, always an easy tell)...
That is the key here, what the load does to the amplification, and we know that is not perfect on the Hugo (hiss on IEMs and reported inability to drive harder cans like the HD800 to their upmost ability), so why can the same not be true here?
I'm happy either using mojo on its own, or with an amp strapped to its belly, however for cleaness of sound from top to bottom that award goes to the Vorzuge...
If I am, as others purport, living in a compromised world, so be it...
Edit: whilst I'm here, might as well add that adding a line level component to mojo's belly seems to eliminate the phone signal noise problem...
1> Every amplifier adds distortion. In this case you are replacing the built in amplifier with your external amplifier (hopefully with a better one, producing less distortion). With the Hugo and Mojo, the amplification stage is built into the DAC and it is not bypassed, so whatever amplification is added is increasing distortion.
2> I can't see your second question, but nobody is saying it is right or wrong. It is up to the individual as to the sound they prefer and whether they are happy to carry around the extra gear to achieve it.