Any others?
Not sure. Reviewers seem to be biased and use clever wording to make some products seem better than it actually is.
Any others?
I would have preferred never to have arrived.
That review should be a template on how NOT to do a review.
The thing about his channel is how everyone blindly follows him and trusts him just based on his words... It's so sick I've seen his headphone reviews and sound demos and whatever Zeos says in the review like "big soundstage, outstanding bass" and I switch over to the sound demo videos, everybody in the comments are like "Wow these have a huge soundstage wow that bass is amazing" when they are listening through completely different gear and in some cases IMO the statements hold no water, but ppl just follow him and trust him only because he has reviewed so many products. One should again imo, get as much information from as many sources as possible and put the puzzle pieces together themselves and not blindly believe 1 guy on the internet.
Any others?
So after the verge review and the Z review, the general consensus is that the chord mojo is a overrated piece of ****.
Thoughts?
I bought one before this happened and now i feel like i made a mistake
So after the verge review and the Z review, the general consensus is that the chord mojo is a overrated piece of ****.
Thoughts?
I bought one before this happened and now i feel like i made a mistake
So after the verge review and the Z review, the general consensus is that the chord mojo is a overrated piece of ****.
Thoughts?
I bought one before this happened and now i feel like i made a mistake
what can I say! Fortunately there are so many other good reviewers that have reviewed our Mojo and do actually understand the subject matter that they are reviewing. Reviewers that don't tend only just to undermine their own reviewing credibility.My biggest gripe is where he says the line-out mode somehow bypasses the 'amp'. That statement right there has a lot of miss understanding, but that could be somewhat overlooked given most reviewers don't get the uniqueness of Rob's implementation. It's the way he presents his 'facts' about it that makes the statement even more inaccurate. As soon as a reviewer says that Chord gear is an amp first and DAC second I raise an eyebrow though.
The balls aren't glass as he continuously says. The cable provided for his review is an aftermarket cable, not stock. Any reviewer should be able to see that. He throws guesses out about the power output @32 Ohm. Not cool to just guess if you are trying to provide information to people. Oh, and he can't count. There are 95 steps in the Mojo's volume, not 100.
I get it, he's marketing to the general public that has no understanding about this gear. But it's that exact reason why he should take some responsibility to be somewhat accurate in his reviews. Apologies for contributing to the Mojo / Z derail.
I would love to ask him what FPGA stands for and the reason for the Mojos design compared to DS and R2R.