uzi2
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2013
- Posts
- 1,638
- Likes
- 478
The same question would also be relevant to anyone considering using a NiMH battery power pack in view of the gradual voltage drop as the batteries are drained.
On the above BNC input issue, I'm under the assumption that the Qutest BNC coax input must have a built-in transformer that causes a compatibility issue with the BNC output of my Audio-GD DI-20 DDC which uses a special "ACSS" 2nd generation coaxial technology (more here). Can anyone back up my theory on this? So I'm planning to use a RCA to BNC coax cable to the Qutest as a workaround, allowing a connection from the DI-20 "standard" coax port rather than BNC ACSS version.
Also apologies for reverting to the LPS topic for a moment, but nobody had an answer on the other thread yet, so here it is: Does anyone have an opinion if gradual voltage build up and decrease is likely to damage the Qutest if turned on / off this way? With some LPSs the supercapacitor is wired directly to the DC output, causing power built up in the supercaps to drain out into the Qutest for a few minutes after power off, and likewise gradually build up to the 5v on powering up. I've done it this way a few times before with no issues but I would like to know if this is likely to cause any long-term damage to the Qutest if power cycled like this every day?
@Rob Watts would you clue us in on the BNC transformer and gradual power cycle question please?
my amp does have balanced inputs but I doubt I would hear a diff tbh
besides, I’ve not seen this being sold anywhere locally. Thanks for the recommendation tho, I’ve heard good things abt it
out of curiosity does anyone turn off their qutest when not listening or leave on 24/7 as per the manual?
On the above BNC input issue, I'm under the assumption that the Qutest BNC coax input must have a built-in transformer that causes a compatibility issue with the BNC output of my Audio-GD DI-20 DDC which uses a special "ACSS" 2nd generation coaxial technology (more here). Can anyone back up my theory on this? So I'm planning to use a RCA to BNC coax cable to the Qutest as a workaround, allowing a connection from the DI-20 "standard" coax port rather than BNC ACSS version.
If I read you right you're praising the DI-20 for being close to another product touting to be the peak of digital quality. It's certainly heralded as one of the best DDC's made according to owners, and for me I've already heard a huge improvement with my USB source even into my mid-fi iFi iDSD Black lablel DAC/AMP via the DI-20.
The only common connection type between the DI-20 and Qutest is BNC, which doesn't include Toslink. I've got a special BNC/RCA cable on order to try to get around the compatibility issue between that connection type.Why not toslink to the qutest directly? We'd not know what have DI did to the data.
I can't see in the manual where it recommends leaving it on 24/7out of curiosity does anyone turn off their qutest when not listening or leave on 24/7 as per the manual?
I can't see in the manual where it recommends leaving it on 24/7
It does say that it is "designed to be permanently connected to a power supply", but nowhere does it state that the power supply should be permanently switched on. I take that more as a warning not to frequently plug/unplug the fragile microUSB connector. After all it does have the feature of remembering your settings, which would be redundant if powered on 24/7
Yep that micro usb connection is the ONE most annoying thing with Qutest imho.fair enough that's true..
Yep that micro usb connection is the ONE most annoying thing with Qutest imho.
I change between the stock and my preferred battery PSU when needed, ie battery down.
And it is always with fear I try to fit that horrible little thing into that micro connection.
I guess a proper connection would obviously have been far too expensive for Chord?
Profit margins before customer satisfaction unfortunately seems to be the rule they follow.
Having listened to Rob's podcast interview I was quite shocked to hear how absolutely ridiculously narrow the parts used margins can be in this business.
5 cents too much !!!!
And a whole project dropped!
That quote makes it a lot easier to put in perspective and understand why so many go to such great lengths to improve on stock products.
I was under the impression that at least DAVE was a cost no object product at its time of introduction?
I also maybe wrongly,correct me if I am wrong, but interpreted his comments on his upcoming "in the next year or so "amp thing" to have a linear PSU unit!
Is the real reason for the lack of linear PSUs on Dave and Qutest and TT2 also simply " too expensive"?
Cheers CC
Hello Nick, yes that is what I think as well, in both cases. I used the "five cents" as an example of sometimes very annoying compromises made within a given budget.Christer, I think the 5 cents too much comment was in relation to his former life prior to Chord? However I think that Rob has previously said that each Chord digital product has a parts target cost before the project starts.
The amp 'thing' to which you refer is surely the long awaited and oft mentioned digital amp . . . .?