TSAVAlan
Formerly with The Source AV
It most certainly does. Recently the Qutest has been a bit more popular than usual from what I have been seeing.I am finding that Qutest has amazing synergy with anything I plug it into.
It most certainly does. Recently the Qutest has been a bit more popular than usual from what I have been seeing.I am finding that Qutest has amazing synergy with anything I plug it into.
It most certainly does. Recently the Qutest has been a bit more popular than usual from what I have been seeing.
Ye Qutest and Hugo tt2 looks like great value no doubt. Cant imagine how good Dave 2 will be.I’ve had the chance to listen to a lot of the high-end DACs now and I really think that Qutest is an incredible value. It easily competes with Yggy and punches way above it’s price point in general. I would have to be absolutely blown away at this point to spend anymore money to upgrade from Qutest.
Agreed, i feel the same. It really pulls out all the details and gives you amazing vocals. Any Next step up is little value for money imho. As you would have to spend double or more for about the same performance.I’ve had the chance to listen to a lot of the high-end DACs now and I really think that Qutest is an incredible value. It easily competes with Yggy and punches way above it’s price point in general. I would have to be absolutely blown away at this point to spend anymore money to upgrade from Qutest.
Compared to other companies Chord seems to rarely support balanced Headphones.
Even the Dave has Balanced outputs but the Headphone output is just 1/4".
Any idea why ?
Component count is very important for transparency. Doubling the number of parts in the direct signal path does degrade depth perception and detail resolution.
But there is another problem with balanced operation. Imagine a balanced differential in, differential out amplifier. The input stage is normally a differential pair (maybe cascoded) with a constant current source. Now the input stage is free to move up and down to accommodate the common mode voltage - but the input stage common mode impedance is non linear, and if the common mode voltage has a signal component (it always will have due to component tolerances) then this will create a signal dependent error current, thereby generating distortion. Unfortunately, the negative feedback loop of the amplifier can't correct for this distortion as it can't see the error on the summing nodes. So there will always be a limit to the performance. With SE operation, this problem does not occur, as the differential input stage is clamped to ground.
Now DAC designers are well aware of this - that's why all high performance DAC's use two single ended I to V converters from the current OP of the DAC's, then use a differential to SE converter to create the voltage OP. There are other reasons for doing this as well, as the DAC requires a very low impedance virtual ground for low distortion, and you can only get this using dual SE amps - another problem is RF and its much easier to decouple SE than differentially - this in turn creates a lot more noise floor modulation, making it sound less smooth.
But for me the most important is transparency. I had an amp that had two modes - differential or SE - listening in balanced mode flattened the sound stage depth dramatically,and it sounded harder, less smooth. That said, there are circumstances when balanced operation can be better than SE, for example when you are looking at connecting a pre-amp to a power amp, and what is best depends upon particular circumstances. In short, if SE operation is noisy, try balanced.
Rob
The DAVE’s balanced output does not have enough Current to drive headphones (it’s very low) and is there for convenience for adding balanced amps. The answer from the designer in the DAVE thread regarding balanced in general...
I’ve had the chance to listen to a lot of the high-end DACs now and I really think that Qutest is an incredible value. It easily competes with Yggy and punches way above it’s price point in general. I would have to be absolutely blown away at this point to spend anymore money to upgrade from Qutest.
We were talking about $30-60.000 cables. That's way too much even for a $200.000 system. I do believe cables bring subtle differences, but IMO they shouldn't worth more than 10% of all your system. $60.000 cables also bring up ethical questions in my eyes.
Except Yggdrasil measures like complete junk (****. let's say it) and Qutest measures exceptionally well. The modi 3 is really the most competent dac schiit makes.
It helps that qutest isn't as big as an engine block too.