DaneNoodles
New Head-Fier
That's pretty impressive. I wasn't aware of this.
That's pretty impressive. I wasn't aware of this.
If you are using the computer as a source, I could suggest trying HQPlayer on the PC instead of mscaler and the H2 as your dac. This will give close to mscaler filter for a fraction of the cost. Just a suggestion that is working for my budget.
Maybe a question for @Rob Watts
Hi Rob, is there any technical mechanism possible for a ground loop 'hum' with Hugo2 if there is only the PSU and headphones connected to Hugo2 and there is no source connected? i.e. there is no 'loop'?
So its a ground loop via your own body
I agree. But if cost is an issue and you have the PC anyway you can get pretty close. I wonder if anyone with an mscaler and HQPlayer has been able to compare the effect. I know I would prefer an mscaler but I also would not go back from the quality change that HQP has provided in the meantime.Im not sure it will, Rob's WTA filter is not available on HQ player. Ive heard you could run crazy 10 million tap filters on that but i doubt it would sound better than the 1 million tap mscaler.
I agree. But if cost is an issue and you have the PC anyway you can get pretty close. I wonder if anyone with an mscaler and HQPlayer has been able to compare the effect. I know I would prefer an mscaler but I also would not go back from the quality change that HQP has provided in the meantime.
I'm sure everything you say is true but for 200$ CAD you can get a taste. That's all I'm saying. I never said it is equal as I do not have the opportunity to compare or even hear the mscaler in my neck of the woods. It would be nice if someone with an mscaler and a PC could try the HQPlayer trial and report. What Rob has done by bringing the importance of transient re-creation has made others try to raise the bar to his level. A good thing for the hobby I think. HQPlayer (with some other front end such as roon) has allowed others to hear what this affect could bring for a moderate cost. I am not a HQP fan boy but appreciate the new level of enjoyment it has brought for now. BTW - It also provides improvement to my TT. It has also made my H2 the preferred DAC for me over my TT now that the digital glare is gone. IMHO.HQ player does not implement a WTA algorithm so its performance will never come close to a hardware mscaler with 740 dsp core processors built on a massive fpga. A case of apples to oranges here. Transients the stopping and starting of notes and the exact precise corresponding timing.
how beautiful music can sound when the original analogue recording is recaptured in its full entirety.
Question, I'm getting into some really pricey stuff and honestly at the same time I'm hoping not to cross "overkill" territory. That's probably inevitable, but here is what i'm not/ or looking for.
Really really good sound, the obvious. PC>USB>DAC/AMP>Headphones. Compact would be great, but portable is not that important. Most likely the headphones would be plugged in by 1/4 stereo, 3.5, or balanced.
Not to big on XLR's. As far as quality goes does USB in/out make any difference or XLR's. Sorry for the stupid questions. You guys are super helpful, thank you!
I listed to some DSD/TIDAL/24bit FLACs
I do love this answer, or my wallet does, but can this be explained?I’d recommend you get a mojo and then unsubscribe from these threads! Mojo has plenty to offer, no need to spend crazy thousands.
probably not without taking a lot of abuse. I think hifi products are so over priced, its crazy, but they count on us being crazy to pay for them. Then there is the whole secondary market, of people just making up crazy prices for cables that could be manufactured for a tenth of the retail value. So, the end customer is really getting fooked over big time, no doubt about that.I do love this answer, or my wallet does, but can this be explained?