1. I'm a big fan of the cross-feed function, particularly for HEK V2's, my preferred setting being CF=2, and I never quite undesrtood why some eminent headfiers liked CF=3. Well now I prefer CF=3 as well, although any CF value is miles better than none at all for the HEK V2's
I never used to be a fan of Cross-feed on the DAVE whilst everything was running in. Now that Uptopia, MicroRendu, DAVE, power and cables have all been bedded down, I really appreciate the soundstage depth that cross-feed on DAVE gives me. I still maintain that the sounds are not as pure with crossfeed on but after just a minute or two of brain processing, the complete depth of the soundstage, the rock-solid and pin-point stability of instruments and voices in the soundstage are so much better with cross-feed on.
My perception CF2 is that the soundstage is a narrow "V" meaning that the centre stage is pushed to the front and the rest is way back and nothing much in between. The sounds on the side are very much lost in the stage with little placement information. CF3 seems to map the entire width of the soundstage with a more natural sounding depth and every sound maps into the depth perception and is placed with pin-point stability and very little brain power required to interpret.
Going back to no cross-feed, I can immediately feel my brain processing requirements going up and the presentation is relatively flat.
Studio albums that have been piecemeal recorded with one or more tracks recorded at different time or even places, stand out in cross-feed mode as the sounds, whilst rock-solid in space and time, can be very different to the rest of the session recording.
CF3 seems to rock my world now. I only use CF2 when a really compressed and flat pop-song album is played where it is nice to have the lead singer (like Adele) stand slightly in front of the music. CF1 does nothing for me in my set-up.
How things change or is it how I've changed?
Regards
GG