Yeah, I get it. Like I said, I misread the quote. I mistook it to mean presenting small detail, given my own experience with the N5. My bad.
When I toured and reviewed the N5 I found the AK240 clearly had more musicality, as in it didn't seem to force the detail to the forefront in comparison to the N5. That was one of the things that struck me about the N5 as it presented the detail CLEARLY but with less depth than I like, and going back to the AK240 made the AK240 seem almost too dark, in comparison, as noted in my review of the N5 (to be clear, I don't find the AK240 to be the best portable gear from it's headphone out). I also found the FiiO X7 to be more musical, although it had a similar amount of detail to the N5, but more holographic. This is with my headphones/IEMs, I expect others to have a different view with their gear.
To be honest it's all relative, and depending on one's experience with a multitude of varying gear you will get a multitude of varying opinions. That's precisely why statements claiming 'more musical than any others' really isn't helpful and is misleading unless the person making the statement defines what comparisons were made, with what headphones/IEMs and with what music tracks and past experience as a baseline. It's all perspective. A better approach, IMO, would be to state that for one's tastes the N5 is the best, and then define what 'best' means.