- Joined
- Aug 9, 2006
- Posts
- 12,932
- Likes
- 1,080
Quote:
why not? i guess it sort of proves that this forums i biased. i have never owned bose nor probably will but someone once said they would never trust anyone with bose in their signature so i put it in as honestly, why not? what does it matter anyway?
the fact that someone likes or does not like a brand does mean nothing about whether they have knowledge. i don't care if you spend 50 000,00 on a home system, it means nothing about your knowledge of sound.
Quote:
you are right: it is not hydrogenaudio. i think many people come from there because it is not as fun over there. however, by being a member and posting a lot in headfi, you suddenly have street cred. you can say what you want and people listen. or you can put things in your signature that prove you are high end or knowledgeable. whether or not headfi and hydrogenaudio are polar opposites is not the problem. the problem is that too many members here think that member ship in a forum called headfi means they know something or can rant.
i have heard people say things like: i saw this guy on the bus with er4s. i wanted to tell him has to get an amp.
there is not respect here. there are no rules for respect. there are no proofs for anything. i love this place but you can do naught but argue because no one listens to sounder science. people only listen to forum posts or sigantures.
my bose signature disqualifies me... that is great. what that proves is that this forum really knows little about anything but marketing -- the same group who say they would never buy bose or apple are the same group who are high and mighty about any little company who comes along and makes fotm. its tiring.
i ain't leaving but there is too little that actually binds us here to proof and truth.
Originally Posted by dallan /img/forum/go_quote.gif What, are you arguing about bit rate with someone who has Bose:better sound through research in his signature, you gotta be kidding! |
why not? i guess it sort of proves that this forums i biased. i have never owned bose nor probably will but someone once said they would never trust anyone with bose in their signature so i put it in as honestly, why not? what does it matter anyway?
the fact that someone likes or does not like a brand does mean nothing about whether they have knowledge. i don't care if you spend 50 000,00 on a home system, it means nothing about your knowledge of sound.
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhilS /img/forum/go_quote.gif Discussion of DBT's is confined to the Sound Science forum. It's not. |
you are right: it is not hydrogenaudio. i think many people come from there because it is not as fun over there. however, by being a member and posting a lot in headfi, you suddenly have street cred. you can say what you want and people listen. or you can put things in your signature that prove you are high end or knowledgeable. whether or not headfi and hydrogenaudio are polar opposites is not the problem. the problem is that too many members here think that member ship in a forum called headfi means they know something or can rant.
i have heard people say things like: i saw this guy on the bus with er4s. i wanted to tell him has to get an amp.
there is not respect here. there are no rules for respect. there are no proofs for anything. i love this place but you can do naught but argue because no one listens to sounder science. people only listen to forum posts or sigantures.
my bose signature disqualifies me... that is great. what that proves is that this forum really knows little about anything but marketing -- the same group who say they would never buy bose or apple are the same group who are high and mighty about any little company who comes along and makes fotm. its tiring.
i ain't leaving but there is too little that actually binds us here to proof and truth.