Can you enjoy lossy (compressed) music through your favorite headphones?
May 25, 2009 at 11:32 AM Post #153 of 234

minjae0810

New Head-Fier
Joined
Jul 31, 2008
Posts
24
Likes
10
I prefer lossless,
but 320kbps is ok and 256kbps is not bad
but anything incl. and below 192kbps is not good...
 
May 25, 2009 at 11:50 AM Post #154 of 234

Chri5peed

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Sep 16, 2005
Posts
3,611
Likes
13
I hate how leaks usually come in 192kb/s and WMA. Keeps me honest.
 
May 25, 2009 at 12:10 PM Post #155 of 234

csh08

New Head-Fier
Joined
Mar 21, 2009
Posts
40
Likes
0
I have to vote no - I just spent many hours recopying my music into lossless - there must be a reason for this!

beyersmile.png
 
May 28, 2009 at 12:32 PM Post #156 of 234

satshanti

Head-Fier
Joined
Jun 16, 2008
Posts
86
Likes
12
Yes, I can enjoy the music, if it's good, even if it's at 128kbps Mp3. Under certain circumstancesI can even enjoy good music through a cheap gettoblaster.
biggrin.gif


I do prefer to use lossless though, because I can enjoy the music a lot more like that. If I can encode lossy files myself, I tend to use OGG Vorbis, rather than MP3, as to my ears they sound better compared to MP3 at the same compression ratio. Compression at Q7, Q8, Q9 and Q10 all sounds better than MP3 at 320kbps to my ears. Q10 at about 500kbps comes very close to lossless at a little over half of the file size.
 
May 28, 2009 at 1:10 PM Post #157 of 234

steviebee

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Jun 6, 2005
Posts
2,717
Likes
13
192 and above, yeah OK...but give me FLAC anyday. OGG Q9/10 is pretty good too. Can I hear the diff? With some recordings on FLAC, yes...but it's simply peace of mind...if I've got the space, I go FLAC. Less - then OGG > MP3 320 > 256 > 192 .

If it has to be 128 > if not a rare recording, I'll read a book
smily_headphones1.gif


Edit/ x2 on the ghettoblasters, but not on phones! Disco babeeeee...
biggrin.gif
 
May 28, 2009 at 9:31 PM Post #158 of 234

archigius

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Apr 3, 2008
Posts
320
Likes
19
I usually use 300-350 kbps ogg, it's really very good, more than other lossy formats.
I loose some soundstage and airness, but it's so near to flac and wav and sometimes hard to distinguish witha a poratble player.

But more than compression, i think the real problem to enjoy compress musica can be the player.
Listening to 320 kbps with a mp3 player can be enjoyable; bur listening to 320 kbps with a good cdplayer/DAC/amp can be great!
 
May 28, 2009 at 11:30 PM Post #160 of 234

catscratch

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Sep 29, 2004
Posts
3,889
Likes
412
Can I enjoy lossy music though most of my headphones? Yes.

Am I 100% sure that I can tell the difference between lossy and lossless 100% of the time with 100% of my music? No.

Do I prefer listening to lossless by a wide margin? Yes.

Of course, all of this doesn't apply to the O2. It's in a different category entirely when it comes to resolution and lossy music becomes much less palatable.
 
May 28, 2009 at 11:45 PM Post #161 of 234

Wolf04

New Head-Fier
Joined
Jun 5, 2008
Posts
20
Likes
0
Seems a lot of you don't follow live DJ mixes. Mixes in 320 are very hard to come by. Most are at 192 and the worst quality one I have is 165. There's nothing I can do about it. It's quality music and I'm not going to delete it just because the recording itself is not up-to-par.

Of course, I have a lot of tracks that are 128, which I'm trying to get rid of. Basically, my goal is to have nothing left under 192 by the end of the year (either by finding better versions or making the hard choice of deleting it, OTHER than my beloved mixes).
 
May 29, 2009 at 12:51 AM Post #163 of 234

mike1127

Member of the Trade: Brilliant Zen Audio
Joined
Oct 16, 2005
Posts
1,114
Likes
25
I've heard some music through the KUSC (a Los Angeles classical station) web feed at 128 kbs that was enjoyable. When I purchased the CD, the higher resolution made it obvious that it was flawed. This was an old recording that had been processed so heavily through a de-hisser that no life was left in it. For some reason it was enjoyable at 128 kbs but not on CD.

I can really enjoy a low-resolution, warm, sloppy sound if the music is good. (Like my car stereo or clock radio.)
 
May 30, 2009 at 2:01 AM Post #164 of 234

DoYouRight

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
May 20, 2006
Posts
2,173
Likes
12
I do always hunt for hours/days/weeks for not just flac but perfect log's and cue files. But for stuff that just has no cd around sometimes you have to suffer. Most of my stuff that is below 320 is on my old desktop harddrives in a shoebox until I get a IDE usb enclosure. But atm I just use my 3TB drive setup for music and 99% is FLAC/CUE/LOG100% BOOM!

I can enjoy songs I know on lower quality but something Im hearing for the first time I am picky about details to a fault but after I know I like the song and get the emotion behind it than it doesnt matter if it's FLAC or not most of the time. V0 I like better than 320kbps havent heard OGG maybe I should try it out. But when you have FLAC there is no need to try other things you are already at the TOP!

Only quesiton is: FLAC Vinyl Rip or FLAC CD Rip?
 
Jun 24, 2009 at 6:46 AM Post #165 of 234

CoMePunk

New Head-Fier
Joined
Mar 5, 2009
Posts
16
Likes
10
yes, around 256-320 kbps sounds good to me
smily_headphones1.gif
Honestly, I can't hear the difference between 320 kbps lossy and lossless (yet
tongue.gif
), so in order to save my HD space, I pick lossy
smily_headphones1.gif
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top