Hi all!
I'm now bringing back my first impressions in the form of a shootout between the
64 Audio tia Trio, the
Andromeda Gold (AG), and
Solaris 2020. This format makes more sense to me since as far as first impressions go, relative differences are more obvious to notice than the details of each earphone's sound on their own. I'll also be pointing out songs that exemplify these differences, as I am firmly a music-first audiophile. To get this out of the way, these are all fantastic earphones and while I will be talking about better/worse features, the differences are not ever really night and day (despite what may sound hyperbolic). All of my listening was done out of the balanced port in my ZX300 with Symbio W Peels (my tips of choice). Here's a picture of what my set-up looks like:
On with the shootout:
Comfort:
After spending maybe 8 consecutive hours listening to Solaris 2020, I can say that it is personally still the least comfortable of my set of earphones. While the AG is roughly the same size, something about the way shape of the Solaris rests on the back of my ear makes it a bit less comfortable. On the other hand, the Trio's are one of the most comfortable headphones I've worn (the Meze Rai Penta's are likely the best). Either way, because this is extremely ear dependent I wouldn't think too much about it since others seem to agree Solaris 2020 is a big improvement over OG.
Soundstage:
To get the easy one out of the way, Solaris outperforms the AG here by a noticeable margin. The way the instruments get laid out around my head on something like
Mingus' Taurus in the Arena of Life is just shockingly good on Solaris 2020, certainly beyond what AG gives me. Interestingly, I find it harder to make a claim about the Trio vs. Solaris. I believe this is mostly because the Trio bass is so space-filling. So, while technically the Trio may have a similar stage size, practically it ends up feeling smaller (or maybe more crowded?) as a result of the bass.
Tonality:
Here's the main event for most. So what's actually different between these?
Bass:
The bass is implemented differently across these earphones. The AG's bass sticks out in this comparison as it is the one with the least sub-bass extension. The AG's bass is characterized by the mid-bass slam/thump (which can be quite satisfying with the right genre). The Solaris retains some of this mid-bass thump but adds sub-bass extension. It's often satisfying and of great quality, yet not great quantity (although bass is like spiciness, everyone's got different tolerances). The Trio has
deep sub-bass extension (about as deep as the human ear goes I'd say) and fantastic texture. It also boasts significantly greater quantity over both Solaris and AG. A great track to test this with is
Pusha T's Come Back Baby. Here, the bass in the track is almost entirely made up of sub-bass and so the AG immediately comes off toothless. Additionally, the more well-behaved bass of the Solaris 2020 does not match the energy of the track. Generally, I find the bass on the Trio to be both of better quality and quantity than on either Solaris or AG, and so it is much more satisfying when listening to genres like Hip-Hop, many Electronic sub-genre's or modern Pop. However, the Trio is still very far from being a basshead IEM and I while I would describe it as V-shaped, its really not that aggressive of a V (points of comparison here are short auditions of Polaris 2 and Atlas).
Mids:
Compared to either the Trio or the AG, the Solaris mids are
significantly more present. This is not to say that they are overly recessed on either the Trio or the AG, since neither has an aggressive V-shape signature. This is most evident on a track like the
Fleet Foxes' Montezuma, where guitars feature prominently and the emotion on the vocals takes the center stage. It's a no contest victory for the Solaris here, though I suspect that and Trio and AG were not really trying to compete here, as their design methodology is simply different.
Treble:
Honestly, all three of these IEMs do
excellently in the top end. The extension is across the board fantastic (although I think the Solaris is sliiiiightly smoother, and AG is a smiiidge sharper, with the Trio as a sweet sweet spot in between). As was mentioned earlier in the thread, I'd describe the AG as having a different texture/timbre at the top end (slightly crunchier?). This is maybe the most similar category of all, but I think the shimmering/reverby sounds on a track like
Frank Ocean's cover of At Your Best (You Are Love) highlight the differences.
Coherency:
Solaris is
wildly coherent. It feels incredibly natural and relaxed. The best track I can think of to high light this is
D'Angelo's Really Love. The song is so delicate that any imbalance across the spectrum is exaggerated and feels unnatural. Solaris excels here, while the Trio ends up overemphasizing the bass and hiding D'Angelo's subtle vocal idiosyncrasies. AG on the other hand tweaks the top end just enough that it sounds a little off.
Conclusion:
I think what I've come off from this is that my AG's are largely redundant in my collection as they are neither as exciting as the Trio, or as coherent as the Solaris. So I suspect that what will practically happen is that the Solaris will be my go-to's for Folk/R&B/Rock/Classical while the Trio's will be my main pair for Hip-Hop/Electronic/Pop. For the sake of my wallet, I hope that this is my endgame... Hopefully you enjoyed reading this! I enjoyed putting it together