EternalShadow
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2005
- Posts
- 180
- Likes
- 18
Really feeling the urge to grab the Nova. Someone, please review! We get that the Andromeda is out of this world, lol
Really feeling the urge to grab the Nova. Someone, please review! We get that the Andromeda is out of this world, lol
This is how I hear CFA Andromeda vs Noble K10UA (using LPG as a source).
Soundstage: both have a very similar depth/height but Andromeda is noticeable wider, with a more holographic sound effect. Both have great separation, but layering effect between instruments and vocals is better in K10UA due to its brighter nature with more airiness.
Bass: Andromeda has a better sub-bass extension and more quantity in comparison where K10UA sub-bass is a little rolled off. Mid-bass punch and speed are nearly the same. Overall, K10UA bass sounds a little tighter and a bit leaner (due to less sub-bass), while Andromeda's sub-bass quantity beefs up the low end, giving it a more analog quality. Both are well controlled, no spillage into lower mids.
Mids: K10UA lower mids are leaner and have less body, while Andromeda lower mids have a fuller body in comparison, but not too thick. Both have a very detailed and revealing upper mids, but Andromeda is smoother and a little more organic in comparison. With Andromeda I hear not even a single peak which contributes to graininess or harshness while K10UA can get a bit hot with a few of my brighter tracks (this one is purely subjective opinion). I also think that due to a fuller body, both male and female vocals sound more natural on Andromeda.
Treble: Both have an excellent treble extension with a great definition, but K10UA treble is a little brighter and with a more crunch. Neither sound sibilant, though K10UA can get close (but never crosses that threshold) with a few of the bright tracks (I'm allergic to 5k peak). In comparison, K10UA has more airiness, but Andromeda is not too far behind.
Both have a relatively balanced signature while Andromeda has a slightly warmer and smoother tonality in comparison to K10UA. Both, Andromeda (5xBA drivers) and K10UA (10xBA drivers) are very detailed and highly resolving and definitely worthy of a flagship status.
This is how I hear CFA Andromeda vs Noble K10UA (using LPG as a source).
Soundstage: both have a very similar depth/height but Andromeda is noticeable wider, with a more holographic sound effect. Both have great separation, but layering effect between instruments and vocals is better in K10UA due to its brighter nature with more airiness.
Bass: Andromeda has a better sub-bass extension and more quantity in comparison where K10UA sub-bass is a little rolled off. Mid-bass punch and speed are nearly the same. Overall, K10UA bass sounds a little tighter and a bit leaner (due to less sub-bass), while Andromeda's sub-bass quantity beefs up the low end, giving it a more analog quality. Both are well controlled, no spillage into lower mids.
Mids: K10UA lower mids are leaner and have less body, while Andromeda lower mids have a fuller body in comparison, but not too thick. Both have a very detailed and revealing upper mids, but Andromeda is smoother and a little more organic in comparison. With Andromeda I hear not even a single peak which contributes to graininess or harshness while K10UA can get a bit hot with a few of my brighter tracks (this one is purely subjective opinion). I also think that due to a fuller body, both male and female vocals sound more natural on Andromeda.
Treble: Both have an excellent treble extension with a great definition, but K10UA treble is a little brighter and with a more crunch. Neither sound sibilant, though K10UA can get close (but never crosses that threshold) with a few of the bright tracks (I'm allergic to 5k peak). In comparison, K10UA has more airiness, but Andromeda is not too far behind.
Both have a relatively balanced signature while Andromeda has a slightly warmer and smoother tonality in comparison to K10UA. Both, Andromeda (5xBA drivers) and K10UA (10xBA drivers) are very detailed and highly resolving and definitely worthy of a flagship status.
From the frequency response of Nova, it looks not attractive. It doesn't even reach 20kHz (40dB).
It is even worse than Orion (http://www.6moons.com/audioreviews2/campfire/4.html) with that -30dB jump at around 12kHz.
From the frequency response of Nova, it looks not attractive. It doesn't even reach 20kHz (40dB).
It is even worse than Orion (http://www.6moons.com/audioreviews2/campfire/4.html) with that -30dB jump at around 12kHz.
Great thanks - I'm guessing it was "white tape" version looking at the graph. I can see why you went with it - compared to Jupiter (for me) its a massive improvement. Nova looks really good (graph) - very much my kind of sig. If dMarc0 running an Australasian tour, I'd love the chance to review them.
And if you do end up doing a tour with them - if could measure his particular pair before you send, and email me the CSV freq,db pairing for the entire freq range on the Nova - I'd love to use it to calibrate my Veritas. I'm reasonably happy with the way it measures below 4 kHz - but beyond that you're 100% right - measures way too low. I could do it manually - but would be very time consuming, and not as accurate as using your measurements as a calibration guide.
Re the shells - I've worked out why a few have issues and others don't. Tip dependent. If I use a narrower tip, I have to try and insert further, the housing presses on the ear, and it's uncomfortable. A wider tip, and they sit slightly off the ear, and the edges aren't an issue. With a shallow fitting ergonomic design it can be an issue I guess. Another option might be to lengthen the nozzle slightly. Just food for thought.
Oh and to shockwaver, the Andromeda I heard wasn't V shaped. Quite balanced overall.
![]() |
![]() |
Campfire Audio - Nicely Done.
Stay updated on Campfire Audio at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
![]() ![]() |
Are those k10's? They look like Savannah's.
This is how I hear CFA Andromeda vs Noble K10UA (using LPG as a source).
Soundstage: both have a very similar depth/height but Andromeda is noticeable wider, with a more holographic sound effect. Both have great separation, but layering effect between instruments and vocals is better in K10UA due to its brighter nature with more airiness.
Bass: Andromeda has a better sub-bass extension and more quantity in comparison where K10UA sub-bass is a little rolled off. Mid-bass punch and speed are nearly the same. Overall, K10UA bass sounds a little tighter and a bit leaner (due to less sub-bass), while Andromeda's sub-bass quantity beefs up the low end, giving it a more analog quality. Both are well controlled, no spillage into lower mids.
Mids: K10UA lower mids are leaner and have less body, while Andromeda lower mids have a fuller body in comparison, but not too thick. Both have a very detailed and revealing upper mids, but Andromeda is smoother and a little more organic in comparison. With Andromeda I hear not even a single peak which contributes to graininess or harshness while K10UA can get a bit hot with a few of my brighter tracks (this one is purely subjective opinion). I also think that due to a fuller body, both male and female vocals sound more natural on Andromeda.
Treble: Both have an excellent treble extension with a great definition, but K10UA treble is a little brighter and with a more crunch. Neither sound sibilant, though K10UA can get close (but never crosses that threshold) with a few of the bright tracks (I'm allergic to 5k peak). In comparison, K10UA has more airiness, but Andromeda is not too far behind.
Both have a relatively balanced signature while Andromeda has a slightly warmer and smoother tonality in comparison to K10UA. Both, Andromeda (5xBA drivers) and K10UA (10xBA drivers) are very detailed and highly resolving and definitely worthy of a flagship status.
From the frequency response of Nova, it looks not attractive. It doesn't even reach 20kHz (40dB).
It is even worse than Orion (http://www.6moons.com/audioreviews2/campfire/4.html) with that -30dB jump at around 12kHz.
From the frequency response of Nova, it looks not attractive. It doesn't even reach 20kHz (40dB).
It is even worse than Orion (http://www.6moons.com/audioreviews2/campfire/4.html) with that -30dB jump at around 12kHz.
Following this thread with rapt attention for some opinions on the Nova. ;_;