Kevin Brown
1000+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2009
- Posts
- 1,037
- Likes
- 45
I was going to do the Magnum lite mod with a pair of SR125i's I have, but Rhydon jacked up the price from $250 to $300 (even though that increase wasn't advertised anywhere up until when I asked to have mine done), and that was too much IMO, and he wouldn't honor the $250 price. Fine: got a pair of RS2i's instead.
But I still had these SR125i's just basically sitting around collecting dust.
So I had Bill mod them to the best of his ability. But I wanted the look to remain stock. So no woodies. (Wood liners though.) Just modification of the headphones themselves as-is.
(I'll try to get him to stop by and comment on exactly what he did.)
OK, so I have SR225i's at home, and I immediately compared the "Bilevideo'ed" SR125i's to those.
Woah: at work for lots of casual listening during the day, I have MS2i's, HF2's, and RS2i's. I rely on the SR225i's at home for less time intensive, but more critical listening to compare different masterings of the same CD. (Early Japanese, West German, UK, US, remasters, DCCs, MFSL, AFs, etc.) I felt: what the heck? The mod'ed SR125i's made the SR225i's sound anemic in comparison. More bass (but not too much, just fuller and deeper extension), and while the level of the highs was similar, the SR125i's were more clear. More detailed, more resolving.
So I finally brought them to work to compare with my HF2's and RS2i's. The HF2's and SR125's now actually have a similar amount of low end, with maybe the SR125i's going a little deeper. The SR125i's highs are a little pumped up vs the HF2's, but again, there's a clarity there that is just really nice for the SR125i's. Actually, the mod'ed SR125i's and HF2's have a scary lot in common. The SR125i's have a nice 3-dimensionality to them now which the HF2's don't have. (I'll say this is just "different" and I don't have a preference one way or the other. The converse is that the HF2's have an "immediacy" and "intimacy" that the SR125i's don't have. Some people might say the SR125i's are imaging a little better now, but I don't have a problem with the way stock Grados image.)
RS2i's vs the "BV'ed" SR125i's: similar feeling I had with the SR225i's, actually, but ... I really like the RS2i's: I feel they are the best example of "balance" that I've heard with any Grado. (That includes the MS Pros, and I absolutely adore the MS2i's conversely.) This is where it gets interesting though: in comparison to the RS2i's, the mod'ed SR125i's do exhibit a slight amount of midrange recess. IOW, the improved low end, and added clarity to the highs somehow puts less of a focus on the mids that the RS2i maintains.
All in all, seriously, I would say that Bill's modifications of my SR125i's puts to shame the stock SR225i, has a lot in common with the HF2, and while "different" sounding than the RS2i, has some very interesting and attractive differences with that model.
Hopefully some others with Grados modified by Bill can comment on how their headphones sound too.
But I still had these SR125i's just basically sitting around collecting dust.
So I had Bill mod them to the best of his ability. But I wanted the look to remain stock. So no woodies. (Wood liners though.) Just modification of the headphones themselves as-is.
(I'll try to get him to stop by and comment on exactly what he did.)
OK, so I have SR225i's at home, and I immediately compared the "Bilevideo'ed" SR125i's to those.
Woah: at work for lots of casual listening during the day, I have MS2i's, HF2's, and RS2i's. I rely on the SR225i's at home for less time intensive, but more critical listening to compare different masterings of the same CD. (Early Japanese, West German, UK, US, remasters, DCCs, MFSL, AFs, etc.) I felt: what the heck? The mod'ed SR125i's made the SR225i's sound anemic in comparison. More bass (but not too much, just fuller and deeper extension), and while the level of the highs was similar, the SR125i's were more clear. More detailed, more resolving.
So I finally brought them to work to compare with my HF2's and RS2i's. The HF2's and SR125's now actually have a similar amount of low end, with maybe the SR125i's going a little deeper. The SR125i's highs are a little pumped up vs the HF2's, but again, there's a clarity there that is just really nice for the SR125i's. Actually, the mod'ed SR125i's and HF2's have a scary lot in common. The SR125i's have a nice 3-dimensionality to them now which the HF2's don't have. (I'll say this is just "different" and I don't have a preference one way or the other. The converse is that the HF2's have an "immediacy" and "intimacy" that the SR125i's don't have. Some people might say the SR125i's are imaging a little better now, but I don't have a problem with the way stock Grados image.)
RS2i's vs the "BV'ed" SR125i's: similar feeling I had with the SR225i's, actually, but ... I really like the RS2i's: I feel they are the best example of "balance" that I've heard with any Grado. (That includes the MS Pros, and I absolutely adore the MS2i's conversely.) This is where it gets interesting though: in comparison to the RS2i's, the mod'ed SR125i's do exhibit a slight amount of midrange recess. IOW, the improved low end, and added clarity to the highs somehow puts less of a focus on the mids that the RS2i maintains.
All in all, seriously, I would say that Bill's modifications of my SR125i's puts to shame the stock SR225i, has a lot in common with the HF2, and while "different" sounding than the RS2i, has some very interesting and attractive differences with that model.
Hopefully some others with Grados modified by Bill can comment on how their headphones sound too.