Frequency response is a useful guide, but everybody's ears are unique, and subtle differences in ear geometry, eartip type/size, etc., can cause significant differences in perceived FR. The only way to know for sure is to spend a reasonable amount of time with both IEMs (testing multiple types of eartip) and try for yourself.
That being said, we know that there is a frequency response (Harman target) that we shouldn't really stray too far from:
We know that most people find the Harman target FR more natural sounding for IEMs, because it mimics the (unoccluded) ear canal resonance generated when we listen to normal, ambient sound. There's a good reason why most people don't like the tuning of the RHA CL2 (
https://www.head-fi.org/threads/rha-cl2-tuning-preferences.894595/), because its mid-range boost goes way above the Harman target. The T9ie has the opposite problem - it goes almost as far below that target in the midrange. That's not to say you won't find vocal outliers - the RHA CL2 has a Jihadi-like devotion from some of the folks on the CL2 thread. Being outliers, they're obviously very excited having finally found a headphone that sounds great to them. But for the
majority of people, you won't want to stray too far from the white curve above.
IMHO, purchasing a T9ie without ever having heard a Xelento would be like flushing $$$s down the toilet.