From the reviews I've seen and the comment chatter I've read, the X3's are not being well received by fans of the X2's. And considering this negative feedback plus the fact that they are @ $200 more expensive, they are shaping up to be the flop of the year.
Are you trying to be funny?
Listen, this headphone came out in September, obo.
So, can a headphone that is out for 40 days, be a "flop of the YEAR"?
Maybe you need to get your math checked. ??
Did you go online and read the reviews?
I read many, and 98% of the reviews praised the X3.
Maybe you should look again more carefully ?
Listen....If a headphone is designated to be a flop because an earlier generation fanboy does not accept the new sound as a superior "audiophile" sound, , then you have to consider that not everything you read is to be taken seriously, or believed.
See, Ive owned every version of this line. All the "X" models, including the X2 and XHR.
Have you ?
So, im telling you, based on my actual experience with all of these Philips designs, that this one is the Audiophile Gear of the bunch.
This bad boy is a totally new design.. Cups, Drivers, Leather......all of it.
And its like i said in my first post or mini review here, ... don't compare this headphone to the previous generations, and dont pay attention to people who downgrade the X3 because they worship the X2 which is not that great of a headphone. In fact its bass it too large, its a V shape, and its treble is too hot.
Fans of the Beyers' and Audiotech midgrade stuff love the X2 because their ears are trained to think that "too bright" is "audiophile, when in facts it not.
This specific headphone set, is a different and superior "X"..... much better then any previous "X" Series.
So, if you believe that a "flop" is based on only the viewpoint of people who are not wanting this headphone to sound better then the X2 , you are being misled and you are missing out on a great sound experience.