FliGuyRyan
Head-Fier
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2010
- Posts
- 80
- Likes
- 0
I know, I know... you're thinking, "They're totally different!"
Well, yes they are. And I liked the 770 a lot better because it actually had some bass. Now I did miss the airy, peppy soundstage of the AD700, so... here is my question:
[size=medium]
As I'm sitting here typing, with the AD700 sitting on my desk looking at me and I'm just shaking my head because their bass just sucks. I'm not a bass-head, but dang... it's just not up my alley because I come from listening to the Monster Turbine Pro Copper/FiiO E5 which is nothing short of an amazing duo (for the $20 FiiO especially).
Now, before you tell me to look "elsewhere" for more bass, please explain WHERE I would look? I just auditioned the AT M50s (was a little muddy, and highs suffered), Beyer 770 (less boomy, more natural and great neutral feel to them - awesome) and Shure 840 (didn't like the Shure at all) today and LOVED the 770 for it's accurate sound, decent soundstage and overall the great bass - but I'm afraid of losing the melodic demeanor of the AD700. I could tell I was listening to closed cans per se. I still liked them, but I would like a more open feel - read on...
Can anyone tell me more about the 880 or the 990 and how they compare to the AD700, AD900 and A900? I just want bass that I can feel but the sound from the AD700 (or better). Is this too much to ask - don't answer that!
I would like to try the AD900, but would the A900 suit me better? And if so, does the Beyer 770, 880 and 990 give the A900 a run for its money? I won't be using a quality amp so the ohms are to remain low (none of this 600 stuff) for awhile. Do the Beyer's 80 and 250 ohm models REALLY need amping?
Please clarify this muddy (sound)land I find myself in.
Thanks,
-Ryan
P.S. What is the difference with Beyer's different lines, like the Pro and the Edition, etc... ohms, headbands... ?
[/size]
Well, yes they are. And I liked the 770 a lot better because it actually had some bass. Now I did miss the airy, peppy soundstage of the AD700, so... here is my question:
[size=medium]
As I'm sitting here typing, with the AD700 sitting on my desk looking at me and I'm just shaking my head because their bass just sucks. I'm not a bass-head, but dang... it's just not up my alley because I come from listening to the Monster Turbine Pro Copper/FiiO E5 which is nothing short of an amazing duo (for the $20 FiiO especially).
Now, before you tell me to look "elsewhere" for more bass, please explain WHERE I would look? I just auditioned the AT M50s (was a little muddy, and highs suffered), Beyer 770 (less boomy, more natural and great neutral feel to them - awesome) and Shure 840 (didn't like the Shure at all) today and LOVED the 770 for it's accurate sound, decent soundstage and overall the great bass - but I'm afraid of losing the melodic demeanor of the AD700. I could tell I was listening to closed cans per se. I still liked them, but I would like a more open feel - read on...
Can anyone tell me more about the 880 or the 990 and how they compare to the AD700, AD900 and A900? I just want bass that I can feel but the sound from the AD700 (or better). Is this too much to ask - don't answer that!
I would like to try the AD900, but would the A900 suit me better? And if so, does the Beyer 770, 880 and 990 give the A900 a run for its money? I won't be using a quality amp so the ohms are to remain low (none of this 600 stuff) for awhile. Do the Beyer's 80 and 250 ohm models REALLY need amping?
Please clarify this muddy (sound)land I find myself in.
Thanks,
-Ryan
P.S. What is the difference with Beyer's different lines, like the Pro and the Edition, etc... ohms, headbands... ?