Jibbie
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2010
- Posts
- 826
- Likes
- 29
I'll definitely write up a review thread comparing the two, as well as a review thread comparing the Pro 900s to the D2000. I'm going to be quite the busy head-fier in the near future
I have the old NFB-12 unit and I have noticed an improve in sound after some burn in. I wish I could try different DAC filters and sound signatures. What's the availability for the company to implement a small module that could attach inside the unit that would allow us to choose filters, by jumpers, pins, whatever? It would be worth an upgrade, don't you think?
After some research, I finally ordered the NFB-12 last Saturday. It has been a week and they have yet to ship it. Hopefully, the upgrade in quality from my onboard audio with my D2000 will be worth the wait.
Make sure to put gain on high.
Make every day a fun day filled with music and friendship!
Stay updated on Dan Clark Audio at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
|
I'm just wondering guys. from what i read when i sifted through this topic is that the nfb-12 isn't that great of a match-up with the hd650s. Is that just because of the amp side of things? or is the dac just not well paired for it.
I'm planning on bypassing the amp section of the nfb-12 all together and hooking it to my LD mkiv. So i'm just wondering if thats a good match up. I want this unit and the price seems like a steal.
Anyone here listened to both audio-gd NFB-12 and Audinst mx-1? how would they compare?
From my new knowledge of electronics I learned that using a fully discrete design is not very smart for headphone amps. Unless your doing high voltage applications op-amps are the way to go.
Another thing about Audio-GD is that they're pushing out new models at a far too quick rate, sacrificing on a proper development process. Also the designing by ear philosophy might not be the smartest thing ever either: When it comes to amps or DAC's you want them to mess up the signal as little as possible. This can only be ensured by measurements, the human ear simply isn't accurate enough. Additionally designing by ear might also cause extra inaccuracy as some distortion might be perceived as sounding better, while in fact such distortion is a bad thing.
I'm actually thinking of selling my NFB-12 after realizing this. I'll probably buy a cheaper DAC with better measurements first and compare the two.
Make every day a fun day filled with music and friendship!
Stay updated on Dan Clark Audio at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
|
Measurements vs. sound is a subject of endless debate, and I don't want to derail the thread, as sound science is better for this topic.
Regardless, the bottom line is there are crappy op-amp implementations and there are good ones, and the same holds for discrete, so making a statement that op-amps are always better is plain wrong.
The NFB-12 is a very competent amp for the price, so frankly who ultimately cares if it's discrete or op-amps, anyhow? I have more expensive op-amp gear, and it does not sound as good. But I don't have a particular bias. When I design analog I prefer to go discrete, but I have heard good op-amp gear, too.
Lastly, if you compare something you believe is better to something you believe is worse, you'll bias your results for certain unless you actually do a blind test, so if you go into this with preconceptions it's not likely you'll change your own mind. My $.02.