hopeless
Banned
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2009
- Posts
- 202
- Likes
- 11
Anyway, for how good is the LT1355, I still miss the LT1469. That can really sound impressive.
Originally Posted by majkel /img/forum/go_quote.gif Thanks for the info. I'll try the OPA552 probably tomorrow. When playing with Cmoy's, I was also able to make the OPA2228 stable at lower gains than 5 but at 2.7 it definitely needed additional compensation which made the sound worse so I just increased the gain. Regarding the AD843 - it's artificially harsh to me with a kind of ugly timbre. You need a lot of nice coloration elsewhere in the signal chain to really enjoy it but it doesn't make overall sense IMHO. |
Originally Posted by ROBSCIX /img/forum/go_quote.gif I started a opamp topic as I figured it would help keep all the oapmps dicussions where people could find them. |
Originally Posted by maddman79 /img/forum/go_quote.gif Link? |
Originally Posted by Bonthouse /img/forum/go_quote.gif It's called "The Opamp thread" (orly? YARLY! IT MAKES SENSE!) and it's on the first page of the DIY section.. Go look it up... |
Originally Posted by maddman79 /img/forum/go_quote.gif AI'm currently taking a stab at my own rendition of the OPA-Earth discrete opamp. Only difference: I opted for a surface mount design, as opposed to through-hole. Board layout has already been completed. PCBs should be in later this week. For this project, I used thin film resistors, tolerant to 0.1%. I plan to use my LCZ for tighter pairing of passive components. Also, I had to do a bit of part substitution for the surface mount transistors. I'll post pictures and share with you my results. If I'm not completely embarrassed by how the final result sounds, I may lend out a couple for review... -Brian |
Originally Posted by ROBSCIX /img/forum/go_quote.gif Can I speak for one of these test units? |