seb7
Head-Fier
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2013
- Posts
- 94
- Likes
- 23
Well...this pretty much convinces me that I don't really know if I want these or not.
How does it stack up with the HE-6 and HE-500? I would guess that the LCD-X is a step closer to the Hifiman sound signature, but still darker sounding with more bass quantity.
Great observations MF. Concerning taking the LCD3 versus LCDX: when you wrote "reserved" - last word, last paragraph before Pros... - did you mean "my sentiments would be reversed"?
My lcd-xc shipped today. Coming Wednesday .... get your popcorn ready boys.
Based on the measurements, the X just looks like a LCD2 with a more prominent treble hump; still wayyyy closer to the Audeze sound signature than Hifiman's, at least on paper.
When comparing the overall downward slopes, the HFM stuff is still less rolled. It sounds that way too. I compared the HE-500 to the LCD-X. The LCD-X is faster, more articulate, and cleaner sounding than the HE-500 from most amps. It may be a bit closer with the HE-500 from my power amp, but I didn't compare with that directly.
Nice...wood choice?
Audeze said that if the wood cups on the xc are removed then the warranty is void.
Ouch! That would suck for anyone who would want to do a custom woodie in the future (Headphile, MCA and the like).
Ouch! That would suck for anyone who would want to do a custom woodie in the future (Headphile, MCA and the like).
So, they fix (some) of the first generation's problems, drop the wood for a massive decrease in costs and charge 80% more. Clearly, we bought too many LCD2's.